User talk:GBL
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Attic
- RJFJR tried to welcome me; User:Matt Crypto thanked me for “contributions to crypto articles”
- We discussed weather “[t]he LRW mode of operations was introduced by Liskov, Rivest, and Wagner.” (Disk encryption)
- The CBC/MAC discussion was moved to the talk page of Cryptographic key types
[edit] Regarding your recent edits
You seem to have gone ahead with disk encryption reorganization without consensus, and without even responding to me on the relevant talk page. I would like to believe this was merely a misunderstanding, but I did repeatedly insist that some articles ought to be kept separate to minimize confusion between what I see as fundamentally different concepts/approaches, and you did not appear to disagree. Please enlighten me, are you doing this deliberately? Just note that Wikipedia operates on consensus. -- intgr 16:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- The idea that I was doing disk encryption reorganization without consensus appears completely groundless. I have started it exclusively as a result of our discussion on the talk page. GBL 20:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- I was repeatedly and specifically stressing that in my opinion, there would be three articles:
- One discussing what I referred to as "block device encryption"
- Another discussing filesystem-level encryption
- A third article pointing out the similarities and differences.
- And I was proposing that the third article would be placed instead of the current "disk encryption" article. I also figured that it would take more than two people to reach a "consensus", or the lack of participants (silent agreement) for a week or so.
- Instead, you merged all articles into one, and picked a name that I had not agreed with. -- intgr 20:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I was repeatedly and specifically stressing that in my opinion, there would be three articles:
-
-
- I'll cross post this to the relevant discussion on WikiProject Cryptography; don't respond here. -- intgr 21:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
-