User talk:Garryq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Garryq, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

• You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
• You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the community portal.
• You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp as well.
• Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 19:13, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Contents 1 re: max 2 80,255 3 Edward VIII 4 Sunderland 5 Anthony Lambton 6 Baron Rix 7 1974 8 Coat of Arms of Queen Elizabeth, The Queen Mother 9 civic heraldry 10 vote 11 Cambourne 12 Union Jack etc. 13 Image:COA_Prince_Harry_Wales.gif and Image:Prince_William_Wales.jpg copyright status 14 Mountbatten 15 Enormous blue square with white cross 16 Navboxes on Stewards of the Chiltern Hundreds 17 Queen James 18 Image:Tudor Crowns copy.jpg 19 Article Licensing 20 Image license 21 unverified image 22 Your image 23 Stuff 24 Hi 25 British counties - again! 26 Image Tagging Image:St Edward Crowns.tif 27 Barnstar 28 Image Tagging Image:39691753 lambton 203pa.jpg 29 COA 30 Power CoA... 31 Image Tagging for Image:DMP_HP_WEB.png 32 Image copyright problem with Image:Colin Powell COA 1.png 33 Heraldry Portal? 34 Image:Colin Powell COA 1.png listed for deletion 35 Image Tagging Image:Lyon at dissolution.jpg 36 Image:Charles coronet.jpg 37 Image copyright problem with Image:Sunderland pre 1949 (Unofficial) wrought iron gates.jpg 38 Image copyright problem with Image:COA_Durham_Bishop.jpg 39 Still a City Councillor? 40 Invite to WikiProject 41 North East England Newsletter

[edit] re: max

Thanks for writing the article in the first place. I hope you stick around wikipedia for a long time. Your enthusiasm is greatly welcomed here. Keep up the good work. Remember, nothing ever has to be perfect because there are 1,000s of others out here to help.

If you ever have any questions, please ask.

Sincerely, Kingturtle 18:03, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)

[edit] 80,255

Ive noticed your spat with User:80.255 on the Sunderland page. What he/she's doing is completely unnaceptable. Policy regarding county naming has already been decided upon at Wikipedia: Naming conventions (places). I've had many arguments with 80,255 at Warwickshire and Coventry feel free to revert his/her changes G-Man 17:31, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Edward VIII

Hello, Garry. I've viewed the revision history of Edward VIII of the United Kingdom:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Edward_VIII_of_the_United_Kingdom&action=history

and I can't find the edit you mention. Could you please provide me with a link to the edit where you made the specific change to the article? Thanks. Happy editing, Chris Roy 15:52, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Sunderland

I am thinking about making City of Sunderland be an article about the city of Sunderland, and making Sunderland just be about the area that used to be part of the county borough. This follows precedent we've set for districts that include disconnected urban areas or large rural districts (e.g. Lancaster vs City of Lancaster, Canterbury vs City of Canterbury, and Peterborough vs City of Peterborough, etc. (See Wikipedia:List of English districts to disambiguate for a big list of districts we've done this too).

I am wondering if you have any feelings in this matter. Thanks, Morwen 17:08, May 3, 2004 (UTC)

Great idea. I renamed Sunderland City of Sunderland, but User:G-Man was none too happy about what I called my hometown and reverted. I have some notes and half articles that can be used for Sunderland. The City is in 3 parts, Sunderland, Washington and Hetton & Houghton, so the article can certainly be divided. garryq 18:06, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

How does that look? Morwen 19:27, May 3, 2004 (UTC)

You've made at least one editor exceeding happy :) Thanks. garryq 20:05, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Anthony Lambton

Hey, no problem at all. I thought the short forms may be useful as redirects, for exampel if somebody types in "Anthony Lambton" in the search box. Happy editing -- Chris 73 | Talk 01:48, 9 May 2004 (UTC)

---

Hi - just a small point this, but when you make links such as the one you just edited in Jack the Ripper, can you please not use underscores (_) for spaces. There's no need to use them, and it makes links look a bit ugly. All the best--Camembert

---

Tnx for yr Senate-classes response; a little embarrassing for it to come from abroad, but hey!
I think that helps substantially. --Jerzy(t) 16:13, 2004 May 14 (UTC)

---

[edit] Baron Rix

In regards to Baron Rix: Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - Tεxτurε 20:19, 16 May 2004 (UTC)

Its back --garryq 21:44, 16 May 2004 (UTC)

---

Hi, Garry. I notice you have reintroduced the error in the article on Richard III of England which says that there are records of Hastings' trial. This is a very controversial article, and it's important to keep it NPOV. If you feel I am wrong and you have evidence that such records exist, please quote a reference and location where they can be viewed. Deb 11:53, 17 May 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I've heard the claim before, that there are records of Hastings' trial, but all the books I've read say that there aren't. However, if they do exist, I'll be quite happy to give way. I don't know if you saw "Historyonics" the other week - that was a surprisingly even-handed interpretation of the known facts, I thought. If the Richard III talk page is short, it's probably because I gave up arguing with a certain person who was determined to have her own way; I just waited for her to leave the project, which happened more quickly than I'd hoped. However, you'll find the controversy has been shared out between several articles, including Edward IV of England, Edward V of England, Princes in the Tower, Dominic Mancini and Philippe de Commines, to name but a few! Deb 16:46, 17 May 2004 (UTC)

Hi again. It's not your fault you took what someone else had written at face value, but I don't think these records exist. I'll have a look at that article on Morton, and see if I can help make it more even-handed. Unfortunately, the only way it can ever be "proved" is to produce the records of the trial. Otherwise, we have to assume there aren't any. Deb 16:47, 18 May 2004 (UTC)

Kindly leave my user pages alone. Mintguy (T) 22:28, 20 May 2004 (UTC)

---

Just wondering - did you get my reply? Morwen 17:01, May 23, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] 1974

I'm digging up some fascinating stuff in these researches - have a look at the Administrative counties of England#1974 : Two-tier section for a start. Of note for Tyne and Wear is that (a) the Local Government Bill 1971 actually named it 'Tyneside' (lated amended for reasons I am sure you can imagine), and it was to include Easington and Seaham. Looking at a map that would have left Durham practically landlocked! Morwen 22:28, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Didn't know about "Tyneside". The Redcliffe-Maud Commission in 1969 (?) never managed to get that far. --garryq 22:38, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Apparently they didn't think it was worth a metropolitan county. They just recommended ones based on Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester.

There are some particular things I'm going to have to look up a bit more. In particular, there were 'passenger transport authorities' for the conurbations well before 1974. Apparently Greater Manchester had a South East Lancashire North East Cheshire (SELNEC) PTA. I wonder if Tyneside had a similar one. Another intesting thing is apparently there were plans for a 'South Hampshire' metropoplitan county, consisting of presumably the Southampton/Portsmouth areas. Morwen 22:48, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Coat of Arms of Queen Elizabeth, The Queen Mother

I was just wondering as to the copyright status of this picture. Burgundavia 10:19, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

• Thanks for the info. As a technical note, you might want to convert it to png to save some download time. Burgundavia 05:42, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)

[edit] civic heraldry

This is just to let you know I replied to your question here [1]. Marnanel 16:14, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

[edit] vote

Good luck! Morwen - Talk 11:31, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Cambourne

Cambourne is definitely worthy of an article. But it shouldn't appear on the list of towns, as by any standard I can think of it isn't a town. Note that the list of towns is not just a list of places, which are usually listed on the appropriate county or borough article. I've removed Cambourne again, along with Barnt Green, which has if anything even less of a claim to the status. Warofdreams 13:33, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Union Jack etc.

Garry

Rather than getting into an edit war, please explain youself at Talk:Flag of the United Kingdom. DJ Clayworth 17:24, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Image:COA_Prince_Harry_Wales.gif and Image:Prince_William_Wales.jpg copyright status

Do you know of the copyright status of these images? Marnanel 16:37, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

As a section of the Royal Household they may be {CrownCopyright}, but as Garter Principal contends "that the question of copyright is not really relevant" in an heraldic display, I prefer {fair use} in wiki's educational context. --garryq 17:51, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You could probably get away with public domain. If "the question of copyright is not really relevant" this would suggest that they are uncopyrightable, or they are effectively so, as it would be impossible for their copyright holders to assert any intellectual property rights over them. — Trilobite (Talk) 05:51, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Mountbatten

Thank you for clarifying the ancestry secion on Louis Mountbatten- it's much more readable now. -FZ 18:59, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Enormous blue square with white cross

The software says that you replaced a bunch of heraldic images with an enormous blue square with a white cross (like this one: [2]). Might someone else have been using your account? Marnanel 23:33, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Navboxes on Stewards of the Chiltern Hundreds

Please see Talk:Resignation from the British House of Commons for my proposal to do away with these misleading additions. Dbiv 22:17, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Queen James

Please monitor the James I of England page and its talk page.

[edit] Image:Tudor Crowns copy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tudor Crowns copy.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 21:15, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

[edit] Image license

Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Drapers_COA.png. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}}

if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}}

if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you.

If you uploaded other images, pleas clarify copyright for them as well, otherwise the images will eventually be deleted.

Thanks, Denni☯ 01:39, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

[edit] unverified image

Thanks for uploading image:Scotland-Royal-Standard.png. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Duk 02:31, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Your image

I noticed you uploaded Image:Marie Lloyd001.jpg, which you noted was an image from your family collection. I took the initiative and marked it as GFDL, but if you wish to use a different license, use one at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags :-). Thanks, ugen64 22:00, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stuff

I wondered if you might take a look at the metropolitan county article, I've done loads of work on it, I think it's mostly accurate, but seem as you seem to know a lot about this stuff you might be able to add something to it.

BTW are you still a councillor.

G-Man 23:10, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Hi there. I'd just like to say your the only fellow Sunderland wikipedian I've come across since I've been contributing (I thought I was the only wikiobsessed person in the city :-) Keep up the good work. All the best Craigy 00:51, May 3, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] British counties - again!

Hi Garryq,

This topic has become a hot potato all over again. There's been constant discussion and argument for weeks. We've now reached a critical point and are having a straw poll on a particular issue to see if we can make some progress that way; if this fails we may need to go to official mediation.

Would you be willing to take a look at the straw poll and consider voting? It was posted on the policy talk page on 22nd August 2005. Many thanks Chris Jefferies 23:37, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:St Edward Crowns.tif

Thanks for uploading Image:St Edward Crowns.tif. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Sherool 18:41, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

[edit] Image Tagging Image:39691753 lambton 203pa.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:39691753 lambton 203pa.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 03:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] COA

I see you were granted a coat of arms last year? I bet that cost an arm and a leg? Nice one, though! You should upload it to the 'pedia for all to see! :-) Craigy (talk) 01:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Lol, I betcha. I think I should start to question how much council tax I'm paying if counsellors can afford to buy arms and I can't! :-D Joking aside, the best of luck for St Michaels in May! Craigy (talk) 16:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Forgive me from intruding, but what is your newly granted coat of arms? Can it be seen online anywhere?--Evadb 11:22, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Power CoA...

Greetings, I had a question about the image that you uploaded of Colin Powell's coat of arms HERE. You mention that this is your rendering of the arms, but they seem almost identical to the version painted by Andrew Jamieson which can be seen HERE. If you did use his painting as a basis, it might be good to credit him as such.--Evadb 11:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:DMP_HP_WEB.png

Thanks for uploading Image:DMP_HP_WEB.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Colin Powell COA 1.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Colin Powell COA 1.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. It looks like the coat of arms designed by Andrew Jamieson for the Heraldry Society of Scotland. I'm not sure that your mangling of things qualifies as a "new rendering." Thanks --Dave Boven 20:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Heraldry Portal?

Hey. I've proposed the creation of an heraldic portal. If you think that such a thing would be helpful, you can voice your support HERE and hopefully we can get the heraldry category items organized better. Thanks for all your hard work on heraldic topics.--Eva ^db 08:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Colin Powell COA 1.png listed for deletion

Eva ^db 14:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Lyon at dissolution.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lyon at dissolution.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Charles coronet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Charles coronet.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Sunderland pre 1949 (Unofficial) wrought iron gates.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Sunderland pre 1949 (Unofficial) wrought iron gates.jpg. However, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

Oden 18:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:COA_Durham_Bishop.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:COA_Durham_Bishop.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Still a City Councillor?

Are you still a city councillor?. Your userpage says you are until 2004. G-Man * 21:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Invite to WikiProject

Hello! I noticed you often edit articles which relate to North East England so we at WikiProject North East England, would like to invite your to become a member of the WikiProject. We work on creating, expanding an making general changes to North East England related articles. If you would be intersted in joining feel free to visit the Project Page.

Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 20:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I would like to inform you that WikiProject Tyne and Wear is considering a name change to WikiProject North East England which was suggested by a non-member, this is being discussed now on WikiProject Talk Page so any comments and/or thoughts would be greatly appreciated in order to reach a community consensus, Thanks you.Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 19:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] North East England Newsletter

Garryq, as mentioned on the Project Page, all the members will receive a newsletter informing them of all the latest news about WikiProject North East England. Their are a small selection of news stories in which I would like to bring to your attention:

The one month milestone!

As you will most probably know, the Project will be one month old in less than twenty four hours, so far the project appears to have been successful so far, almost five hundred articles have been tagged informing viewers that the article is within the scope of this project, the Project now has eight members which is good but I'm sure that will double or even triple within the time of the next newsletter

Urgent help needed

As mentioned above, urgent help is needed for tagging articles and rating them for their quality and their importance, by viewing:

• Category:Tyne and Wear
• Category:Northumberland
• Category:County Durham

and all of the subpages, a range of untagged articles can be found, there will be at least a thousand their in which require tagging and I/we need your help in doing this!

That is all for this newsletter, if you would like to bring anything to my attention or have any comments to make then please leave me a message on my talk page or leave a note on the Project talk page and I/someone will get back to you as soon as possible. Thank you for reading and I hope you are still enjoying being a member. Regards - Tellyaddict 20:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)