User talk:Gareth Aus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
|---|
Contents |
[edit] AfD nomination of Westfield North Rocks
An editor has nominated Westfield North Rocks, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield North Rocks and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 10:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Template:Help contents back
I've reverted this template back to how it was in November. The positioning in the top right was ok for the monobook skin, but messes up other skins such as classic, as it appears over the top of other links. – Tivedshambo (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Template:Active Wiki Fixup Projects
Do you have a rational for undoing my revisions? Jeepday 14:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Delnav
Are you aware that {{deletiondebates}} already fulfills that function? >Radiant< 08:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes but this is more comprehensive. -Gareth Aus 08:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
As a matter of fact we're trying to clarify the deletion system by merging and combingin the relevant instructions, thus reducing the overall verbiage. See Wikipedia:Deletion policy/Draft for details. >Radiant< 08:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Ah excellent. -Gareth Aus 09:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Help desk header redesign
You probably didn't mean it to happen, but your redesign of the help desk header caused the section edit links on the help desk to point to the wrong questions (probably because your edit introduced two sections in the header itself somehow). I've reverted your change, so the help desk can continue to function without any issues. If you want to re-establish your changes, please use a way that does not break the section editing of the help desk and test it before implementation. - Mgm|(talk) 08:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
