Talk:GameGuard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 January 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep and stubify.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GameGuard article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: Imagic Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks Merge: Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

I wrote most of the more detailed information from my own research, which is why there are not many sources. Also, I realize that the article is not written very well. Please do not dumb-down the content, but improve the writing instead. Thanks, "AttiSoft"

Um, did you not notice the afd nomination for this article? The decision was to delete most of this article as being inappropriate for wikipedia. Recreating the parts that were pulled as part of a decision immediately after the decision is final is a real abuse of the system. I would suggest that you read up on these subjects to understand. Wikipedia:No_original_research, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not In the last one note: wikipedia is not an instruction manual or guide. Please don't revert the article to what has already been deemed inappropriate. If you want to imprive the article in an appropriate manner please do.--Nick Y. 19:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Gotcha.