Template talk:GAList

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Usage

{{GAList|1a=|1b=|1c=|1d=|2a=|2b=|2c=|2d=|3a=|3b=|4a=|4b=|5=|6a=|6b=|6c=}} 

Available arguments are aye, nay, wtf, and ???, none or other argument gives undecided mark.

{{GAList|1a=aye|1b=aye|1c=aye|1d=aye|2a=nay|2b=nay|2c=nay|2d=???|3a=aye|3b=aye|4a=wtf|4b=???|5=aye|6a=|6b=aye|6c=nay}}

results in:

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is well written.

   a (prose): b (structure): c (MoS): d (jargon):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (inline citations): c (reliable): d (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

[edit] Notes

I've added a couple short reminders of which each short term means. I'd suggest 6b is unneccesary, unless it's being used to excuse the article from needing images. Adam Cuerden ^talk 21:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)