User talk:Funpika
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
All archives may be found at User_talk:Funpika/Archive.
Contents |
[edit] Wii
I noticed that you voted on the Wii's FAC. Being a Nintendo fan also and knowing rules of FAC, would you please mention that you are a Nintendo fan or abstain due to bias. Usually, it is good etiquette for people associated with the article to not vote, but rather improve the article. The Placebo Effect 01:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am removing the vote. Funpika 01:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't remove it, just cross it out with your reason The Placebo Effect 01:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I can't find a single edit from Funpika in the Wii article. Being an aficionado of a certain topic doesn't de facto disqualify you from supporting an article about it. Funpika, if you honestly feel that the article fulfills the proper criteria, you should support it, and neither does one have to point it out in the support unless one really feels it is necessary. Placebo, I believe you should be more careful about handing out proscriptions like this.
- Peter Isotalo 12:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't remove it, just cross it out with your reason The Placebo Effect 01:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Crawdaunt
Am I allowed to remove this article from the PokeProject's Current Focus Section now?(It's a GA.) Vikrant Phadkay 16:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- GA was the goal? Fine with me. Unless you want to make sure it reaches Featured it should stay. Funpika 17:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you so much! It's so nice to be thanked. I appreciate it. Will (aka Wimt) 22:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome! Funpika 22:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 142.214.60.130
Noticed you gave a last warning for blanking to this user who has blanked another page Computer networking. Inseeisyou 19:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- What the heck are you talking about? Funpika 19:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- I gave an only warning to him for a different page today. Funpika 19:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your warning to Leafyplant
You warned me for restoring Kings after it was blanked. [[1]]Leafyplant 19:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- I must have accidently clicked on the wrong user. Sorry. Funpika 19:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] archiving WT:PCP
while i appreciate your efforts, there were a couple discussions you removed where the last post was not five days ago. We have to assume that not everyone checks the page every day, and just because no one posted to a topic for two days (or in one case, one day) does not mean that the matter is over and there doesn't need to be any more discussion on the subject. You should retain at least any topic that had been posted to within the past seven days, and that's really only when the page is becoming unmanageable - usually due to several large discussions going on at the same time. I'd appreciate it if you restored any topics that had posts for this past week. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Review work for Version 0.7
Hi Greeves, welcome to the Wikipedia 1.0 team (a little late)! You may be pleased to hear that our first CD release will be coming out in late March. Now I'm wanting to get reviewing fully under way at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations, and I see that you've signed on to help. To help new reviewers, I've written a reviewing FAQ page. Can you take a look at the to do list, and see if you can help us out? If you have any questions, please leave me a note. Many thanks, Walkerma 04:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for pitching in to help! Walkerma 01:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Crawdaunt
Hi, I have just edited the nomination page so you might want to see before making major changes to the article. Vikrant Phadkay 11:47, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Move page
I was wondering if you oculd use the "move" tab to archive WT:PCP and then just copy the old topics over. It looks really awkward to have some archives moved over (some by me, some by others) and some just cut-and-paste. At least we need to decide on a consistent method. Hbdragon88 21:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your warning on my talkpage
Hi. Administrators have to stay on top of vandalism using rollback, which occasionally results in a rolling mistake when vandalism is reintroduced, especially when a wrong link is clicked. I am removing your comment from my talkpage, including the warning, which was not necessary. In cases where administrators make mistakes, your best course of action is to leave a note on their talkpage stating "Hi, I believe you reverted the wrong IP during the confusion", and not issuing a test warning meant for IPs and newcomer editors who are fooling around, not those who are administrators who have been around for two years and have never vandalized. Keep up the good vandal fighting though! — Deckiller 22:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining that. Funpika 22:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA
It's a small world :) Thanks for passing the article. — Deckiller 23:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sock Puppetry
Having looked at the accusation I can see why you would think that, but I can assure you that Political Avenger is not a sock puppet, but merely a friend who agreed with me and at my urging registered so that he could vote with a user name rather than an IP address. However we had both read the page over a week ago and had been discussing what to do before either of us registered, me so I could start the AFD, and him so that he could vote in the debate. I understand how a quick registration and vote would look but the registration was done to make it clear that we were not going to hide behind IP adresses rather than to try to fool any one. Politicalwatchmen 23:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Just to be safe I should at least request that Checkuser is used on you. It would give accurate results of if you were using a sockpuppet or not. However you mentioned that Political Avenger was your friend. Could this be a Meatpuppet? Funpika 00:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I just checked the checkuser policy and until the vote has closed I can't checkuser. And that is only good if it even effects the outcome. Funpika 00:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not 100% sure if it would be considered a Meatpuppet, he regularly reads wikipedia, and has edited from IP addresses before, and would have voted using an IP address, however I said that a registered name would look better than and IP, so I'm not sure if that would count. The request for him to use a registered name rather than an IP was a sincere one. Politicalwatchmen 14:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] You
You're sort of lame.
[edit] poke portal
i've updated a lot of things and reimplemented sections that were missing (collaboration, dyk, news), i worte out more details at Portal talk:Pokémon. I noticed you wrote that the dyk would be updated every monday... well... it's monday! good morning! -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 15:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
