User talk:Fujicolor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, Fujicolor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Just H 15:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Wladyslaw Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wladyslaw Portrait.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

The picture Wladyslaw Portrait.jpg is a private scan from myself and I give it free for Wikipedia.

[edit] Copyright

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Adolf Gottlieb Fiedler, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.biblioteka.opatowek.pl/opatowek_dzis/index.php?go=3a. As a copyright violation, Adolf Gottlieb Fiedler appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Adolf Gottlieb Fiedler has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Adolf Gottlieb Fiedler. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Adolf Gottlieb Fiedler, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Garion96 (talk) 02:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Translations

Are you translating material from the German Wikipedia? If so, you need to mention that in your edit summary, so the editors there get their proper credit. Also, you can add links to other language versions like so: [[de:William Shakespeare]]--it'll put the links on the left side under the search bar. NickelShoe (Talk) 18:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I see. You're actually writing both versions, aren't you? NickelShoe (Talk) 19:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Biblioteka Opatowek.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Biblioteka Opatowek.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SW Dejter

Well, make sure you add some verifiable sources. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC) There ist a source: The link to the Opatowek Libary. There is also the text about Dejter.


[edit] Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello Fujicolor! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox

I'm not sure - you could ask User:Piotrus, though. Biruitorul 16:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Proszę, na mojej dyskusji pisz po polsku lub śląsku jeśli możesz. LUCPOL 16:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

AAMoF the Infobox Poland was meant solely for towns and cities, definitely not for communes and counties. I don't see a need to expand it, as we have separate infoboxes for that. //Halibutt 20:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Język

Czy potrafisz posługiwać się językiem polskim? Jeśli tak, to na jakim poziomie (pl-0, pl-1, pl-2, pl-3, pl-4, pl-N). Pytam się, bowiem chcę wiedzieć czy kiedyś będę mógł porozmawiać z tobą po polsku. Pozdrawiam. LUCPOL 20:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Infobox City Poland

Hi. Don't get me wrong, I am glad that you are working on the city infobox, and I think adding more information will be useful, though of course we have to be careful not to include so much that the box becomes confusing. At the moment I am somewhat unhappy with the general appearance of the box. It could be much improved. Take a look at the infobox for Paris (just to pick a random example) to see what I mean. Note for example that in it the fonts used for headings are small and that there are no thick lines to separate various section of the box. This is not a criticism of you, but rather the state of Poland-related infoboxes on English Wikipedia in general. They have simply not received much attention recently. Balcer 17:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I am not an expert on Polish geographical divisions (I live in Canada). The place to go for good advice in that area is probably Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography of Poland.
Nevertheless, as far as I understand it, in Poland a large city is technically an urban county, but it is rarely referred to as such. Similarly a small town can be a its own urban commune (gmina), but it is rarely referred to as such. To make matters more confusing, some large cities are capitals of counties that are named after them and include the area around them, but do not include the actual city, since it forms its own separate urban county (compare Lublin and Lublin County). The same pattern follows for some gminas/communes (i.e. the town is the capital of two communes).
Anyway, it follows that it is unnecessary to include the "gmina" heading in the town infobox, since these cities are never thought of as gminas (except in the most formal way which is not interesting to Wikipedia readers). In other words Sanok and Sanok Urban Commune/Gmina are the same things, but no one would talk about the Sanok Urban Commune/Gmina.
Maybe the best proceed is just to adopt the format that the version of this box on Polish Wikipedia uses. Balcer 04:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recent edits

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again.

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. -- MightyWarrior 17:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Agaton Opatowek I.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Agaton Opatowek I.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyrigh t questions page. Thank you. Conscious 19:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandal

I have been accused of being a vandal on User:LUCPOL/Vandal:R9tgokunks due to past editing disputes with yourself, or other being involved in ways with yourself. Since you have been mentioned, i'd like to ask if you could please comment on the mentioned report, Thanks much. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 15:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../f/u/j/User_talk%7EFujicolor_f410.html"