Fuel dumping

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Aircraft Fuel Dump 2 Dump-and-burn 3 Fuel Dump in War 3.1 See also

Fuel dumping is a practice used by aircraft that are equipped to jettison fuel in the event certain types of emergency situations that require a return to airport they've just taken off from, or that require a landing at an airport short of the originally intended destination.

In general terms, aircraft have two major types of weight limits, those being the maximum structural takeoff weight, and the maximum structural landing weight, with the maximum structural landing weight always being the lower of the two. This allows an aircraft on a normal, routine flight to takeoff at the higher weight, consume fuel enroute, and arrive at a lower weight. (There are other variables involving takeoff and landing weights, but they are omitted from this discussion for the sake of simplicity).

It is the abnormal, non-routine flight where landing weight can be an issue. If a flight takes off at the maximum structural takeoff weight and then faces a situation where they must return to the departure airport (due to certain mechanical problems, or a passenger medical issue) they will not have had time to consume the fuel getting to their original destination, and will be over the maximum structural landing weight to land back at the departure point.

As jets began flying with U.S. airlines in the late 1950s and early 1960s, the FAA rule in effect at the time mandated that if the difference between an aircraft's maximum structural takeoff weight and its maximum structural landing weight was greater than 105%, the aircraft had to have a fuel dump system installed. Accordingly, aircraft such as the Boeing 707 and 727, and Douglas DC-8 had fuel dump systems. Any of those aircraft needing to return to a takeoff airport above the maximum structural landing weight would simply jettison an amount of fuel sufficient to reduce the aircraft's total weight to below that maximum structural landing weight limit, and then land.

During the 1960s, Boeing introduced the 737, and Douglas the DC-9, the original models of each being for shorter routes, and the 105% figure was not an issue, thus they had no fuel dump systems installed. During the 1960s and 1970s, both Boeing and Douglas "grew" their respective aircraft as far as operational capabilities were concerned via Pratt and Whitney's development of increasingly powerful variants of the JT8D engines that powered both aircraft series. Both aircraft were now capable of longer duration flights, with increased weight limits, and complying with the existing 105% rule became problematic due to the costs associated with adding a fuel dump system to aircraft in production. Considering the more powerful engines that had been developed, the FAA changed the rules to delete the 105% requirement, and FAR 25.1001 was enacted stating a jettison system was not required if the climb requirements of FAR 25.119 (Landing Climb) and FAR 25.121 (Approach Climb) could be met, assuming a 15-minute flight. In other words, for a go-around with full landing flaps and all engines operating, and at approach flap setting and one engine inoperative, respectively.

Since most twinjet airliners can meet these requirements, most aircraft of this type such as the Boeing 737 (all models), the DC-9/MD80 and Boeing 717, the A320 family, and various regional jet ("RJ") aircraft do not have fuel dump systems installed. In the event of an emergency requiring a return to the departure airport, the aircraft circles nearby in order to consume fuel to get down to within the maximum structural landing weight limit, or if the situation demands it, simply lands overweight without delay. Modern aircraft are designed for possible overweight landings in mind, but this is not done except in cases of emergency, and various maintenance inspections are required afterwards. Many movies and TV news stories mistakenly assume that all aircraft can dump fuel, when in fact most cannot. In certain atmospheric conditions where the moisture content of the air is high, 737s (and other aircraft) flying at low altitudes sometimes leave a moisture trail that can come off the top of the wing, wingtips, or trailing edge flaps. Moisture trails coming off the trailing edge flaps can appear especially odd, since the moisture is being "spun" by aerodynamic forces. It's quite possible that some people observe these moisture trails and may think this is fuel being dumped, but it's just water vapor, and not fuel.

Longer-range twinjets such as the Boeing 757, 767, 777, and Airbus A300, A310, and A330 may or may not have fuel dump systems depending upon how the aircraft was ordered, since on some aircraft, they are a customer option. Three- and four-engine jets like the Lockheed L-1011, McDonnell Douglas DC-10/MD-11, Boeing 747, and Airbus A340 usually have difficulty meeting the requirements of FAR 25.119 near maximum structural takeoff weight, so most of those have jettison systems.

Actual fuel dumping operations are coordinated with air traffic control (ATC), and precautions are taken to keep other aircraft clear of such areas. Fuel dumping is usually accomplished at a high enough altitude where the fuel will dissipate before reaching the ground. Fuel leaves the aircraft through a specific point on each wing, usually closer to the wingtips and further away from engines, and initially appears as more liquid than vapor. Here are still photos of fuel dumping from a 747, A340, and L-1011. Fuel dumping on a Boeing 767 can be seen about 2 minutes into this video.

The largest scale fuel dumping occurred on September 11, 2001, when many international flights were refused American airspace entry due to numerous hijacking incidents. Many of these international flights were fueled for travel well into the American interior. Many such flights were diverted into Canadian airspace, Newfoundland specifically, or instructed to return to their point of origin. For those mid-flight aircraft unable to land safely due to excessive fuel weight, dumping became necessary.

A fuel dump is exactly what the term implies, a "dumping of fuel." However, the term is also used to note any "discarding of fuel."

Though fuel is currently expensive and disposing of it can be hazardous to the environment, from multiple perspectives, fuel dumping may be a life saving tactic.

[edit] Aircraft Fuel Dump

Many aircraft have the ability to dump fuel, mainly to save weight in case of emergency landing. For instance, if an aircraft is too heavy to land in case of an emergency shortly after take-off, the pilot may choose to dump the aircraft fuel to lower the total weight of the aircraft in order to avoid the collapse of the landing gear upon landing or the loss of control on the runway. Not all civilian airplanes have a fuel dump system, however particularly the long-haul ones that have a considerable mass of fuel at takeoff, like the Boeing 747/767/777 or the Airbus 330/340, carry one. Smaller aircraft like the Boeing 737 or Airbus 320 can land overweight or circle around the airport to consume the fuel. Military aircraft also have fuel dump systems in case of premature landing caused by technical problems or combat damage.

[edit] Dump-and-burn

A dump-and-burn is a fuel dump where the fuel is intentionally ignited using the plane's afterburner. A spectacular flame combined with high speed makes this a popular display for airshows or as a finale to fireworks (eg. Riverfestival).

F-111 aircraft are often used for this purpose in Australia, including during the closing ceremony of the 2000 Olympic Games. Pilots have described the experience as exhilarating, although they themselves cannot see the flame - just the orange glow in the sky as the huge flame produces massive amounts of light.

Some sources suggest the United States Air Force has banned the practice for cost and safety reasons. It has little practical use in combat except for potentially lighting up an area for observation at night, although naturally not during active combat (the plane would simply make itself into a target). It may also aid as a distraction for a heat seeking missile but is difficult to achieve the effect due to the temporary heat and can sometimes act as a smoke screen for a tailing enemy aircraft. Since it is time consuming it is not very practical even tho it only takes a short moments time to achieve.

Dump and burns are also referred to as "torching" or "zippo"s.

[edit] Fuel Dump in War

If an enemy base is captured, it is often practical to have a supply dump, where all supplies possible including fuel that can not be carried on a retreat are destroyed so the enemy may not use them against the original owners.

An extreme example of a supply dump was the Patriotic War of 1812 where (assumed) the Russians burned Moscow, their own capital city to ensure the French did not retain it.

[edit] See also

Emergency landing