Talk:Frugalware
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Article style
I'm trying to fix the tone, but I seem to have some problems that I can't find what parts are too promotial. The word 'try' is mentioned multiple times. I'm not saying that you're wrong, you have more experience than I have. But a little help pointing out what's wrong would be helpfull --DNAku 20:45, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Well, I'm no expert either, but you could try reading other articles about similar products for example the original Slackware and comparing the tone with the tone of this article. Sam.
Erm.. My main problem would be the crappy english. I am going to fix some of it now, but i guess it needs more than that. Nazgjunk - - Signing is for Whimps 13:18, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
I don't think that the article needs the release dates of release candidates. Such dates are not important or useful, and they take a lot of room. They are not reported in articles about SUSE and Mozilla Firefox although they have such releases. Both are much bigger projects than Frugalware. Also, their articles have more editors, so its more likely that some of their editors understand the style issues. -82.215.243.178 20:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)