Talk:Front velocity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

I believe this is the same as group velocity. Should we redirect? -- Pgabolde 20:25, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Actually I think this is usually called the signal velocity. It's not quite the same thing as the group velocity, in the cases where v_g > c. -- DrBob 17:59, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

No, all three are different. Signal velocity is usually defined as the velocity measured from when a pulse reaches half its maximum intensity. Clearly this is not the same as front velocity (which can also be defined as the speed at which a sudden change in intensity travels). These distinctions were thrashed out by Sommerfeld and Brillouin a long time ago. --Tdent 12:11, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Reading Brillouin's "Wave Propagation and Group Velocity", the way he defines the front velocity, it is always equal to c (for light, of course). That's the speed that at which the Sommerfeld precursor (or "first forerunner", as he calls it) travels. Your definition seems closer to his "velocity of energy propagation" (U_1). Is there a difference in terminology here? --Bob Mellish 20:35, 4 October 2005 (UTC)