User talk:Freder1ck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Barnstar

Have a barnstar for this edit and others showing similar finesse of wording.

The Original Barnstar is awarded to User:Freder1ck for excellent finesse of wording on Catholicism-related articles, in service of the neutral point of view.

--Ginkgo100 ^talk 04:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Baptism

I think the CCC summary is better. It is certainly more authoritative. It contains, I think, all you gave except the question of the sacramental character or seal. That is mentioned in CCC 1280, just after my quotation. I omitted it for brevity (there is no need to give the whole teaching of the Church at this point), but if you think it should be included, put CCC 1280 in too. The present text is shorter than yours was.

"To be fully effective, infant baptism must be completed ..." is open to serious misinterpretation, as if it denied the ex opere operato efficacy of baptism. Yes, I know you didn't mean that. But defending against such misinterpretations would require adding complex explanations. And aren't "catechesis, Eucharist, and Confirmation" required for adults no less than for children? Personally, I am convinced that nothing more than "Yes" should be put in that box. I added the CCC quote only to prevent reappearance of what I consider to be in some way misleading.

If you wish to discuss this on the Talk page, then, by all means, go ahead. I'll look at the page tomorrow. Lima 15:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Note to Self Re: Vandalism

Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as {{subst:test}}, {{subst:test2}}, {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}}). Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked. If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the {{subst:test4}} tag, request administrator assistance at Request for Intervention.

[edit] disgusting image

it's showing up all over wiki but i don't know how to revert it. Andman8 03:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Since it's not in the code, it must be a hack. It would be good if an admin could speedily delete it soon. Freder1ck 06:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Freder1ck

[edit] Note to self re: welcome templates

Wikipedia:Welcome templates Freder1ck 21:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Freder1ck

[edit] note to self re: articles requested

from Pius XII

For those interested, here are the Saints and Blesseds created by Pius XII for which we have no article. Saints: Mary Euphrasia Pelletier, Bernard Realini, Jeanne Elizabeth des Ages, Michael Garicoits, Jeanne de Lestonnac, Maria Josepha Rossello, Anthony Mary Claret, Bartolomea Capitanio, Emily de Rodat, Mariana Paredes of Jesus, Vincenza Gerosa, Vincenzo M Strambi, Anthony M Gianelli, Emilie de Vialar, Francis Xavier Bianchi, Maria Domenica Mazzarello, Gaspar del Bufalo, Joseph M. Pignatelli, Maria Crocifissa di Rosa, Herman Joseph. Blessed: Rose Venerini, John Baptist Turpin du Cormier, Mary Assunta, Marcelino Champagnat. user:savidan (talk) (e@) 18:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Catholic-link

A deletion discussion in which you voted, that of Template:Catholic-link, is up for deletion review, where the template may be deleted or retained depending upon the review discussion. You are welcome to comment and/or vote at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Template:Catholic-link. The key point of this discussion is whether the "default keep by no consensus" result was correct; discussion of the template itself is secondary (but may still be important). — coelacan talk — 04:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)