Talk:Frank S. Scott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects
Click on [show] for further details

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] See comments

This article is supported by the Military work group.

More information about this article...

This article has had a peer review by the Biography WikiProject, which has now been archived.

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Related task forces (nations and regions):
	United States military history task force

	Frank S. Scott is part of WikiProject Pennsylvania, which is building a comprehensive and detailed guide to Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit the attached article, join or discuss the project.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Frank S. Scott was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake.

Date of review: 11 December 2006

[edit] Failed GA Status

I failed this article because it largely lacks citation in certain areas, and it could be better worded in certain areas. The man is definitely notable, but the article, I feel, is not really long enough to be a biographical good article. Diez2 21:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)