Talk:Franck-Condon principle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| High | This article is on a subject of High importance within physics. | |
|
This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
||
I have added a major expansion to the existing stub in an attempt to bring the Franck-Condon Principle entry to full article standards. There are quite a few improvments that can be made and I will try to work on some in the comming weeks. In particular I think it would be nice to incorporate figures with real data, for example a real data version of figure 2. I someone has some nice data to incorporate please go ahead, otherwise I will try finding something in the literature that can be added under fair use. Somoza 10:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Franck Condon approximation
Should "Franck-Condon approximation" redirect to here? I've made this redirect already... --HappyCamper 16:48, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think "approximation" is used instead of "principle" when the author wishes to emphasize the limitations of the assumptions that are used in the Franck-Condon principle.Somoza 09:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lemma
Why is the article buried under stuff which belongs to the harmonic oscillator ?Arnero 08:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- For example??Somoza 10:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Next steps
What are the next steps for this article? Perhaps we should highlight some computational approaches for handling large FC systems? --HappyCamper 15:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Go ahead HappyCamper, I now little about computational methods, but I would be interested in reading a sections on the topic.Somoza 12:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
