Talk:Fractal Analytics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Neutrality
I'm concerned about the neutrality of this article. It uses the word leading several times without justification and the overall tone is much like a marketting piece for the company. These statements need to be backed up, eg by citing a trade magazine or independent analyst. Stylistically, it should also cut down on the buzzwords and put the openning comments on Mirchandani further down into the article. I'm not saying it's wrong, just that it doesn't justify the claims and reads like a vanity piece. -- JDX 04:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hope your queries have been adressed. Please feel free to edit the article to your satisfaction.
- I was relunctant to change the article as it's clearly being maintained by Tanksingh and I wanted their approval. Nevertheless, I've reworded the opening. It's a bit clumsy, but if people are happy with it let's get rid of the POV. -- JDX 05:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Since the necessary modifications to the tone of the article have been done. I am removing the POV. Where Therez a Will Therez a Way Tanksingh 21:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Marketing bumpf
Removed the direct citation of corporate marketing bumpf and summarised.--Saganaki- 14:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)