User talk:Fr3nZi3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Your images
Hi, here's a guide to uploading images and how to place them on pages. I've added licensing info to the Ashley pic, but the one of the 'Top Model', still needs licensing info. I'll resize the 2 you've recently placed, but another editor may remove them soon because of the licensing information. All images on Wikipedia need to be licensed, in order for us to be allowed to use them. Can you please add info as to where you got that image from? Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Thanks. tv316 07:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you.
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Mickiechamp.jpg
-SCEhardT 01:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks can u help me, coz I am new to wikipedia. I got it from wwe.com, please help me if you can!
STOP ADDING "FAN" MOVES THEY ARE NOT THE REAL NAMES YOU ARE A VANDAL AND POWER HUNGRY PLEASE STOP
[edit] Melina Perez
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Melina Perez article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --LBMixPro<Speak|on|it!> 08:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks and no problem. I see that you've been interested in Pro wrestling articles. You might wanna check out the Pro wrestling WikiProject, a group of people who share the same interest, and share ideas and resources. --LBMixPro<Speak|on|it!> 05:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks I'll definately check it out! Fr3nZi3 19:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signature moves
you must understand what is deamed a signature move a Schoolgirl roll up and other generic moves for girls spear takedown followed by punches/slaps isnt signature nor is a move which a person performs once in one match considered signature... well noted move which are closely associated with a wrestler are considered signature... i.e. the Monkey Flip being it was the very first move she used to display her wrestling abillity and a move she would go on to frequently use, and i will agree La Magistral Pin is also a move to keep. --- Paulley
- also move naming... moves should be in lower case, also "High Crossbody" that is not a name she has esspecially given the move... its not like she is using the boston crab and callling the "Walls of Jericho" so it should not be displayed as such --- Paulley
-
- Fair enough, though id like to see her in a couple more real matches so she can really develope a move list --- Paulley 19:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- All we need now is Molly Holly and we will have are selfs a fully fledged women's divison... oh how i miss Molly --- Paulley 19:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- True, Melina along with Jillian Hall... (ohh i like her... why JBL, why fire her... thats the only mistake that great american has ever made)... wait i got side traked where were we oh yes... real women wrestlers... yea Hall was really good in the indy cicuit... WWE need to utilize the women wrestlers... maybe bring in for british female wrestlers (id love to see Erin Angel or Nikita kick some diva butt) -- Paulley
-
- As for the draft lottery, it will happen whenever Vince thinks WWE needs a shake up... so that could be at anytime... and Melina's Kyra gimmick was good esspecially as she had a large variaty of moves... i would like to see MNM go over to RAW just to see Melina as champ and have MNM win the real WWE tag titles --- Paulley
-
- I like Smackdown, there not afraid to try new things... i doubt MNM would have been such a big thing if they debuted on RAW... i mean nitro was there for a couple of weeks and he couldnt even figure out a good name (well, until Nitro) --- Paulley
-
- RAW and SmackDown are very different brands when you really look at it... i always thought it was a good thing splitting the two apart but its always good to see thing shuffle about with the draft and such -- Paulley
-
- The Women's division is getting a little push at the moment... all good --- Paulley
[edit] PLEASE ASSIST, WRESTLING FANS OF WIKIPEDIA
Me and the soon to be departing (hopefully not) Moe Epsilon are setting up a project to deal with the music of this great business. It will be Wikipedia:WikiProject Music of wrestling. Join if you are remotely interested - every little helps! Thanks. Kingfisherswift 17:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mickie James
Trish has only gone to ringside to support her twice since she has joined, that isnt classed as managing someone. I've only removed it ONCE so to ask me to stop deleting it is wrong. Lil crazy thing 07:39, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Jerry Lawler called Mickie's hurricanrana Mickie-canrana...when she had the rematch with Lita and Mickie does use Missile Dropkicks in her matches.
[edit] Trish Stratus
I reverted your addition of the criticism section again If you're going to put a criticism section, you'd better back it up by Citing reliable sources. Thanks. --Jtalledo (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Melina
Theres nothing wrong with the picture at all i like it, but it doesnt matter if people dont like it its her up to date picture as her appearence has changed. Lil crazy thing 05:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proof Mickie James Posed Nude
It's widely known amongst almost every wrestling fan online that Mickie posed nude before. I already posted a link to these photos on Mickie's talk page as proof, but I guess you didn't look there. This page has links to most of Mickie's nude photos that are clearly labeled by R.B. Kane: http://forum.phun.org/archive/index.php/t-79067.html
So, please stop removing the paragraph about her nude work from Mickie's Wikipedia now.
Thank You!--CJ 06:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Melina Perez
It doesn't matter if J.R. said it or not - it's still an opinion. Things on Wikipedia should be neutral and verifiable. If you can find a reference to J.R. or someone in WWE saying something to that effect, then it can be there as something like "Since coming to RAW, she has been billed as having a more aggressive wrestling style." --Jtalledo (talk) 21:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trish Picture
i dont like the new picture on trishs page but it is a free use image. If you change it everyone else will change it back because it is a free use image, it tells you to not remove it by the picture. Lil crazy thing 06:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Amy Dumas
In this edit you removed a link to Cutter (professional wrestling) and replaced it with an outdated link to Professional wrestling throws. You also added the move "Lita Bomb" despite failing to cite a source for this addition, and linked to "Hurricarana" rather than "Hurricanrana". In addition, you changed "Litacanrana" to "Litacarana". In total, four counts of bad editing. If you continue to vandalise pages by adding spelling errors and breaking links, you will be reported. In addition, please do not add opinions to discussion pages, as you did here. If you continue to make damaging edits to pages, you will be reported for vandalism. Thank you. McPhail 23:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- You changed "Litacanrana" to "Litacarana" here. If you wanted to add the "spinning out powerbomb" then fair enough, but I don't see why you felt the need to make numerous other unproductive and harmful changes. McPhail 14:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's also worth noting that the move in the video you posted is actually a spin-out powerbomb, not a spinning out powerbomb. McPhail 14:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Misunderstanding
Hello Fr3nZi3!
I did not vandalize the sites of John Cena or Candice Michelle. I reverted the vandalism. Please look at the history.
IP 209.240.206.212 wrote about John Cena in line 5: death_date = Hopefully soon in line 15:He is quite possibly the most overrated and untalented pile of crap to ever win the WWE Title.
IP 172.202.42.181 wrote about Candice Michell in line 31: Candice Michelle is the no.1 sex bomb she has nice tits nice arse her pussy just wow and the way she has shaved in to a shape is amazing.
I reverted both sorts of vandalism.
So you are angry with the wrong person. But that happens.
Weird Bird 22:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Ash1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ash1.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 23:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mickiexmas.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:Nnenna.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:Melinaaa.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Melinaaaa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Melinaaaa.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 01:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Melinasvr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Melinasvr.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 01:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mickiechamp2.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:241.jpg)
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:241.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 01:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Chickkick.jpg)
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Chickkick.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 02:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mickiechamp6.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lita2.jpg)
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Lita2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 02:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Trishpic...jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Signature moves
Hi, i have seen some of your edits on Booker Huffman, and David Bautista, where you have removed or changed some of there signature moves... just to let you know Booker often used the Pildriver and the Missile Dropkick to finish matches before entering WWE... as for Batista, he used his strong clothesline to knock-out opponents regularly after doing it legitimatally during one match on RAW he continued to use it as a unique move rather than a generic one making it a signature move... if you couldnt remove/change these again it would be much appriciated --- Paulley 07:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for saying you did the booker thing and i agree on the generic move removal on Batista... but like you said he did use the strong clothesline as a signature while on RAW; just cus he doesnt use it now doesnt make it anyless of a signature move --- Paulley
[edit] A note about your wish to add running DDT to John Cena's page
you were mad [according to the talk page of john cena that when you added 'running ddt'to cenas finishing moves section it got removed.it is possible that they felt it hadnt been established enough to be considered a finishing/signiture move.how about we wait,and if in a few weeks he has continued to use it,we'll add it to the finishing/signiture moves section?i am snape.i killed innocent bugs. 23:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proof of JFK
Just for this eventuality I kept an mp3 of the interview on my computer, the reason I haven't listed it as a source is that links to a fileservice wouldn't really be allowed. Here's the interview: http://rapidshare.de/files/31634128/kennedy_interview_05_26_06.mp3.html --- Lid 01:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Amy Dumas
Check WWE.com - the moves are referred to as the "DDT" and "Moonsault", not the "Lita DDT" and "Litasault". Lita DDT and Litasault are names used in video games, not names acknowledged by WWE. McPhail 16:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not trying to be difficult, I'm trying to maintain a high level of quality in the article, and that necessitates sticking to official move names, not names invented by fans or video game companies. McPhail 16:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- That seems fair enough. McPhail 17:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Name: Lita
Height: 5 foot 6 Weight: 135 pounds From: Sanford, N.C. Signature Move: Moonsault; DDT Career Highlights: 3-time Women's Champion Associates: Edge WWE Debut: 2000 Trained By: Dory Funk Jr.
Thats from WWE's Offical web page. Does it say Litasault?NO, it does not.Plus I've never heard of the Lita Bomb either but it's possible because these days anyone does a Power Bomb gets it named after them. My main problem was you saying she does the Leg-Feed Enzu every match which is false.Razorface
[edit] Relax, dude, seriously.
You need to keep calm, or you're going to blow out a gasket. Please check out WP:COOL.
On another note, please read WP:NPA. I'm looking at your posts on the Trish Stratus article talk page, calling editors "pests" and "bufoons" (sic) is/are a personal attack(s), so be careful. Thanks. -->So sayeth MethnorSayeth back|Other sayethings
- It's a personal attack because you're calling other editors names. There, I used the 2nd grade version :). You're commenting on the editors, and not content. Also, as much as you'd like to think it's vandalism, it's a content dispute. -->So sayeth MethnorSayeth back|Other sayethings
- Also, please learn to check out a page's edit histories, you might gain valuable insight as to why certain edits are made (and who is making them!) Trish Stratus article history page. Some of your edits are nonsensical. "Forearm shivers" is NOT Trish specific. Why have two Stratusfactions? Why link to Kick when there's a Bicycle Kick subsection in Professional wrestling attacks? -->So sayeth MethnorSayeth back|Other sayethings
- "Forearm shivers" should not be italicized because it's not HER name for the move. The way it is now is fine, but before it was "Forearm shivers (Elbow smashes)". About the bicycle kick, it's nonsensical because you reverted it to an incorrect link for no apparent reason. And I wasn't attacking you, you keep making elephants out of mice. -->So sayeth MethnorSayeth back|Other sayethings
- Nope, I was not attacking you. If you had read WP:NPA, you'd know that a personal attack constitutes attacks about the contributer, and not the content of their edits, which is what I was commenting on. And I explained why each part of your edit was nonsensical in my view. -->So sayeth MethnorSayeth back|Other sayethings
[edit] License tagging for Image:Spinningkneeloutfacebuster.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Spinningkneeloutfacebuster.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re;Melina note
The move itself has been a staple of diva matches for years due to it combining common hair pulling tactics and faceplanting. Melina didn't popularise it as popularise means to associate with or lead others to identify the move with the user. Melina at best is a user of the move. –– Lid(Talk) 15:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- Key lines - "only notable user of the move at the moment" and "notable user of the mvoe at the moment". WP:PW has long agreed to not list users of moves and that to be listed they need to either be an innovator (inventing the move in question. See: Mitsuharu Misawa and either the Tiger Driver or Emerald Frosion), populariser (bringing a move to the public eye so it is associated with them though not necessarily inventing it. See: AJ Styles who has popularised the Styles Clash but it was innovated by Vic Grimes) or modifier of a move (taking a current move and adding a twist to it that makes it a modification. See Chris Hero's Hangman's Clutch). The variation you are describing can be seen in many diva matches from as early as 1999, after Ivory popularised the facebuster itself. I have removed Torrie Wilson on your reasoning, but I am reverting the text to the older one because long before Melina began using it it was part of the standard facebuster definition. She is not an innovater, populariser or real modifer as the modifier already existed. –– Lid(Talk) 08:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- The reason sit out has always had its own section is because while not the original standard facebuster it is by far the most common facebuster, also a sitout move is different from a kneeling move. Ohn the very article you will notice the seperation from double underhook facebuster and lifting double underhook facebuster which is by and large ended with a sitout. In regards to your comment that "she doesn't grab the hair", well that's fine as most standard facebusterds don't grab the hair either including Ivory's original version, which also spun. You may end up creating a subsection but even then your rationale for including Melina is flawed as she is still simply a user, no matter what happens nothing can change that and her listing would be against policy. –– Lid(Talk) 15:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Naming a move doesn't qualify inclusion either unless the name itself gets adopted as a generic title, which is evidence of popularity. See how the sharpshooter is the "sharpshooter" and not known as the Scorpion hold (as named by its innovater Riki Chōshū) or Scorpion Deathlock as named by its other most known user Sting). We don't rename sitout powerbombs Batista Bombs just because Batista uses it, or fireman's carry takeovers into F-U's, naming a move is rather meaningless unless it was the name the innovater used, the name of the popularised version or the name of the modification. –– Lid(Talk) 15:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Melina/Facebuster edits
Please can you not keep adding "Spinning Kneel Out Facebuster." it is a pointless subsection for a slight alteration on the standard facebuster which is already noted within the article. Esspecially as the only reason you are adding it is to put in a user (something we dont even add to these articles)... i understand you are a fan of Melina.. but this will be no longer tolerated. --- Paulley
-
- Thank you. However, i have only ever seen Melina use this move once and i wouldnt by anymeans say she popularized it in american wrestling... thats a little far fetched isnt it --- Paulley
[edit] Sharpshooter
With respect I never removed 'The Sharpshooter' from Trish's move list. Although I would adovcate not having it there because she only used it as a finisher once. It was a real fairytale ending for her career, a Canadian wrestler (in her final match) in Canada winning the championship that's at sake with the Sharpshooter it doesn't get much better then that. But we don't add moves to wrestler's pages just cause they do it once no matter what they did with it. Night Bringer
- I've asked for confirmation on the prowrestling project page. But I haven't seen any evidence on it to believe that a finisher is added to a wrestler's page if they only used it once regardless of what they got from it. EG Shawn Micheals is not listed as using the Sharpshooter as a finisher even though he used it at the Montreal Screwjob.Night Bringer
-
- I haven't touched your assertion of Trish using the Sharpshooter as a finisher. I've registered doubts about it. That's all. And leave HBK's page alone, he hasn't used the Sharpshooter in years and the project managers have clearly decided he doesn't use it as a finisher.Night Bringer
-
-
- Got confirmation. It's not notable because she only used it once.Night Bringer
-
[edit] Lita pic
You said: "What is wrong with a Lita picture. What is inappropriate about the picture??"
- Which image? --Yamla 01:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- I assume you are talking about Image:Lita Tatoo.jpg. Please do not add images to articles in violation of WP:FUC. Please see the image page itself for the information it is missing. --Yamla 01:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Further personal attacks
Please refrain from making personal attacks like this. See WP:NPA. Thanks. --Yamla 01:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
You said: "Ok I used personal attacks but only because some scumbags continue vandalising pages! I might just leave Wikipedia if it continues, because I have had enough!"
- I understand how frustrating that can be. I've reverted approximately 15,000 instances of vandalism, and I know it can be hard to keep your cool. But it is important. --Yamla 05:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] John Cena
Please do not add {{sprotected}} to articles like you did to John Cena, as that will not protect them. An adminisitrator must manually protect an article in order to prevent new/all users from editing it. You may request protection at WP:RFPP. Thanks, and continue to take down those vandals! I c e d K o l a (Contributions) 16:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Melina.1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Melina.1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Cw-fridaynightsmackdown-genericshow-gl-12 003589-0d00a6-500x280.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cw-fridaynightsmackdown-genericshow-gl-12 003589-0d00a6-500x280.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)