Talk:Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-Importance on the importance scale. |
:
  |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject American Animation, which aims to cover topics on Wikipedia related to animation in the United States. If you would like to join, you can edit the article attached to this talk page, visit our project page, or leave feedback. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WP: CN, a project to protect articles relating to Cartoon Network. If you would like to participate, you may join at the project page. |
|
|
[edit] Section Length
It seems to me that length of each of the sections (especially the character ones) are WAY too long. They have a lot of good information but it seems that a lot of it isn't necessary in an encyclopedia article and is more like trivia. I figured I'd ask here before editing anything, just in case. Does anybody really disagree with this? Brain 22:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- My only concern is for some of the more sprawling character bios when there's a separate article for that, the rest reads fine but anything that seems trivial can be edited away and if anyone dislikes it they could always revert and take out what they feel to be correct. No need to have an editwar over it. --treelo talk 21:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Article assessment
I concur that the article is B class. It covers the majority of the information you would expect. It's greatest weakness is that none of the information is verifiable to the reader so I have tagged it with a request for citations. I have rated it as mid importance as the show has been recognised with awards.--Opark 77 23:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
