From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Post any discussions related to the article "Forumer" here --Gsmuk 19:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 5 Days 2 Other 2.1 Needs Work 2.2 Isn't NPOV 2.3 Reordered/Rewritten 2.4 Downtime Statistics

[edit] 5 Days

This article has 5 more days left unless an admin or other wikipedia user should object. It is not a neutral article and was written by it's own staff members. Unacceptable.

I rewrote this. No longer a true statement. Striked out to avoid confusion. Matt 20:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Other

It looks like an ad? Edward NZ 06:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC) And it is not an ad...--59.144.38.252 11:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

That may be so, but it definitely looks like one, so I'm putting the POV template on it. "Great place for general chat" is definitely not NPOV, and "high quality servers" doesn't sound too great either. --Pyreforge 11:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

actually, both of you ar wong. It is a good host, infact one of the best Forum hosts out there. And no I am not the owner, but just a satisfied user. --Rsrikanth05

That's not the point. A good forum host it may be, but it's still not NPOV to say it is. --Pyreforge 11:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

I am doubtful that this can be called biased, the fact htat it has high quality features is just a fact.

I'm sorry, but I'm pretty sure you're wrong. Please read Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view, particularly "Let the facts speak for themselves". Whether it has high quality features or not is subjective. --Pyreforge 17:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Needs Work

This article needs a rewrite, and I am trying to change various sections at different times. Any input would be appreciated. Ajwebb 21:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Done, rewritten. Slightly more NPOV, and no more stupid subtitles. Matt 12:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Isn't NPOV

"High quality servers" actually have 60% uptime, "Great place to chat" a.k.a the support forum which has been ruined by members being banned, leaving and then returning to spam. Highly biased, needs a re-write. 81.159.79.170 13:34, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I have removed the "high quality" and mentioned a line about the ads being displayed on the free accounts. Francinne 11:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, they are FAR from high quality. Server 10, which is hosting RPG-World forums, is down about 60-65% of the time, and then there's the famous bug of the Forumer software that produces /'s next to all "'s, which completely ruin the quotation. Both these issues have been up for months, and they haven't done shit about it. 130.243.212.107 01:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

I've trimmed out several false features in the features section and removed a lot of advertising words. --RedPooka 06:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reordered/Rewritten

Ok, so I've made alot of changes. You can see exactly what I've done here and make any changes to the new article if you so wish.

Once you've refined and completed the article to a high standard (if required) I think it would be advisable to remove the NPOV sign. Matt 12:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree that it would be advisable to remove the NPOV tack after reviewing the article.

Ryan444123 12:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Downtime Statistics

If someone would prove those stats about downtime I would be grateful as to me it looks like a smear campaign.