Talk:Foreign policy of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Recovered "real version" after "neutralization" of vandal. by Template:User Zapatancas is trolling. Stop it. This is not the attitude to have on wikipedeia, which is a cooperative effort. If you think wikipedia is about neuttralising people and making false accusation go tell the arbcom, SqueakBox 16:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

People have made a terrible effort to provide the information in this article. You have no right to destroy it. If you had any kind of good intention you would start a formal deletion process but you don't because you know you act in bad faith. Zapatancas 15:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

People? Only you and I have worked on these articles and you have reveted everything I have ever edited on these pages. if I remember rightly you set SquiealingPig (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) onto me within an hour of me putting a redirect on these articles, so who is acting in bad faith? My using the Afd proves it is not me, and we will see what the community thinks, SqueakBox 17:04, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] History of these sub-pages

He was then blocked and has now been permanently blocked. It simply is not credible that this nasty troll was not Zapatancas, who already had 2 accounts (Zapatero and Zapatancas, though Zapatancas is nopt a sock of Zapatero), the language used is the same and he has kept up the virulenmt hatred towards me ever since, SqueakBox 15:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Problems with copyright

There cannot be any problem with the copyright of this page. I have written 99% of what is here and I have only posted it to the Wikipedia. The other site has evidently obtained the text from here so the copyvio notice can be removed. In any case, a thank you to the user who has made the effort of ensuring everything was right. Zapatancas 15:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Can you please prove this. Do not remove the copyvio yourself. As the author of this article you have no right to do so. get an admin to look at the case. As the author your removal of the copyvio notice twice would be considered vandalism, SqueakBox 14:43, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

I am still waiting for someone else to lok at the copyvio, SqueakBox 15:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Looks great now, SqueakBox 15:47, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Zapatancas, I thought it might be a copyvio. Stop fantasising aboput my motives, SqueakBox 15:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)