User talk:Flockmeal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please append comments to the end of the page by adding a new section with "==Title of your choice==" or reply to a comment listed. This page is occasionally blanked, please review the history of this page for older material.


Contents

[edit] AMMO TROOPS

There has been another response posted to your criticism of the article and its objectivity and your general ignorance regarding AMMO troops. Please have a read and reconsider your objections. ~ConciergeMike

[edit] GWB

Can I ask that, if you are going to mass delete and undelete GWB, that you remember to protect it in the meantime and add a little note in place of an editable redlink? Thanks. -Splashtalk 03:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Do not delete this article. You just locked the database. — 0918BRIAN • 2005-12-14 03:34

[edit] Talk page

Hello, you have left this: User talk:Flockmeal/December 2004 as a broken redirect. Would you like it deleted or do you still need it? – ugen64 15:36, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright help

Hello. I'm currently editing a couple of physics related articles, and I'd like to upload some images from my own research (graphs, photographs, sketches etc) to illustrate some of these topics. However, I'd like to retain the right to be identified as the author/creator and possibly to use the images in other publications in the future, while at the same time allowing them to be used in Wikipedia (both by myself and other editors). Do you have any suggestions as to which copyright (tag) would be appropriate? O. Prytz 07:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Thanks for the welcome

Hey, Flockmeal! Sorry I've not been able to get to you lately, but I've been really busy. But anyway, thanks for welcoming me to Wikipedia. This way I know that somebody's out knowing that I'm here and I'm not just stuck on my own. -Shinobi101 20:54, Jan 2, 2006

[edit] It's Always Good to Smile

[edit] Thanks for welcoming me - one year too late!

hey flockmeal, Its one year too late, but thank you for welcoming me to wikipedia! Until today I thought that the welcoming message I recived was an automated message by some program. jidan 16:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Underlined Links

Hi, I noticed that the links are formatted differently now, and they're underlined. I seriously don't know if it's going to stay this way, but it is, It is VERY annoying and I believe it uglifies the article! Please inform me on this matter and I'll be more than grateful! =) Thanks -- Omernos 22:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quick Question

How do I attach the superscript "citation needed" to the end of a sentence in an article? Job 06:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Job

Good job fighting vandalism.--Seadog 19:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Tom-Mcclintock.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom-Mcclintock.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok 22:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleted text about how much CO2 is in the rocks

On the Carbon dioxide page

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide

The following text that you added 03-11-2004 was removed 01-12-2007 by Sikkema

If all the carbonate rocks in the earth's crust were to be converted back in to carbon dioxide, the resulting carbon dioxide would weigh 40 times as much as the rest of the atmosphere.

Since I found no discussion about this change, I was wondering if the data was wrong. If it is correct, I think it should be re-added, if it is wrong, then an explanation is necessary since this statement has been on line for almost 3 years and at least 100 other pages quote it (based on a Google search).

I posted this message to the related discussion list - but there was no reply.

Q Science 07:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)