Talk:Flowform

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Skeptic's perspective

There must be something written debunking this - I'll keep trying to find a link.

As a water engineer - M.Eng.Sc (Water, UNSW) - I find this kind of thing frustrating. I understand that it sounds appealling and beautiful, but if people actually understood science, they would hopefully stop trying to use semi-scientific-sounding language to describe it. Talk about auras and mystical vibrations if you believe in those things, and of course buy a flowform if you think it'll look nice. But please understand that there is nothing here to indicate a scientific, actual, verifiable effect apart from the trivial effect of a little bit of oxygenation. It is pseudoscience.

Anyhow, that's my perspective, but I won't impose it on the article. --Singkong2005 ^talk 10:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC)