Talk:FlossBrite
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Perfection is hard to achieve
Hi Ronz! The first short version of FlossBrite was Non-notable and unencyclopedic, the improvement of the article that was requested become to detailed and look at your opinion like advertisement. Please define the advertisement elements in the article to help remove them. Thanks. By the way, I see you watch the dental floss article and have probably more experience. What you think SoLongBaby and Serenedipity2006 editing in dental floss are like sock puppet activity or not? Thanks. Feel 02:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Discuss the dental floss issues on its own talk page. Those editors think there are spam and copyvio problems... As for this article, start with some good secondary sources that are verifiable (see WP:OR & WP:RS). I don't think your expansion of the article has addressed the issues of notability (see WP:N) and being encyclopedic (see WP:NOT). Instead, it now comes across as an advertisement (see WP:SPAM). However, if good sources exist and can be verified, then these problems shouldn't be too difficult to solve. --Ronz 03:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Hi Ronz, Thanks for direction but they don't help me to improve the article in any way. I studied polices and tried to make the article in accordance with polices - evidently I don't succeed so well if you have objections. If we will try to improve the article at the general point of view we will not succeed. I propose to proceed step by step. Step one: What sentences in the article make you feel that that article may be advertising. We will try to solve that. After that we will deal in the similar way with other your concerns. Please help me. If you don't have nor one sentence that in your opinion advertise please remove the ADV template. If you see such sentences or edit it or even delete it. I will at least understand your concert point of view. Thanks Feel 06:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Start with the source material. Format it similarly to other articles and provide links to any existing online materials. It all comes down to what sources are available. --Ronz 15:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- No, good deal is a good deal. We will go step by step. You tagged article as POV and ADV and I want to know the reason. As is told citation is needed. POV and ADV are large mater about the stile and biases. What sentences you consider inappropriate? Please delete it, it is so easy and no time consuming. I will understand your POV and will improve the article. Its nonsense look for online sources if article is intended as illustration for the dental floss classification and more than that is tagged ADV. This is the branch article of the Dental Floss. I don't view any purpose for online link.
- Your refuse to mention the biased sentences mean that or you made an abusive act tagging article or you doesn't assume for yourself the good fight rules. It doesn't look good in any way. I hope that that misunderstood will be solved by your kindness - you will indicate or delete inappropriate sentences that justified the POV and ADV tag in your opinion. Thanks.Feel 04:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please don't make demands of me. I've provided you with issues to address, a means to begin addressing them, and the relevant wiki policy. Sorry if you feel that is not enough. I'm requesting deletion for the reasons already given. --Ronz 05:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Start with the source material. Format it similarly to other articles and provide links to any existing online materials. It all comes down to what sources are available. --Ronz 15:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Ronz, Thanks for direction but they don't help me to improve the article in any way. I studied polices and tried to make the article in accordance with polices - evidently I don't succeed so well if you have objections. If we will try to improve the article at the general point of view we will not succeed. I propose to proceed step by step. Step one: What sentences in the article make you feel that that article may be advertising. We will try to solve that. After that we will deal in the similar way with other your concerns. Please help me. If you don't have nor one sentence that in your opinion advertise please remove the ADV template. If you see such sentences or edit it or even delete it. I will at least understand your concert point of view. Thanks Feel 06:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
