User talk:Flavio.brandani
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] image tag
Please fix the tag on Image:000003.jpg. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC) Actually, looking at where the image is used, this is not fair use. Here are the fair use guidelines for such an image:
This image is a screenshot from a copyrighted film, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the studio which produced the film, and possibly also by any actors appearing in the screenshot. It is believed that the use of a limited number of web-resolution screenshots
- for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents
- on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,
qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Fair use for more information.
To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as described on Wikipedia:Image description page, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
This is not how the image is being used, so it is not fair use. The image will be deleted shortly. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Non disperare
Esistono wiki in centinaia di lingue, comunque il mio consiglio non lo vuoi seguire? cambia nick........ however my counsel doesn't want to follow it? change nick--Freegiampi 18:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] nice talk?
naaaaaaaaaaaa, va bene cosi, chi se ne frega, fai il bravo piuttosto, non rispondere alle provocazioni, --Freegiampi 17:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Commons linking
If you will take a look at Mexican Wolf history you can see how I did the linking for the commons tag. I think this is what you were trying to do. Regards, Nashville Monkey 13:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re
Oh thank you very much darling :-) I was tried to do it... but I failled...In your opinion dear Monkey, Do you think that my edits are costructive? kisses Flavio/Tigre Reietta 13:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I think some of your edits are constructive, some are unnecessary. Galleries are unneeded, that's what the {{commons}} tag is for. You also place new sections in the wrong place, study other articles so that you can become familiar with article structure. On a second note, and this is personal opinion, most Americans don't like the terms darling, sweet, or kisses from people they don't know. It is inappropriate at the least, and offensive to many. Please stop. Regards, Nashville Monkey 14:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I understand dear Nashville... but galleries are utiles for eyes :-) I'm an esthetics creature...:-) Alas, Alas no one think that I'm a good wikipedian neither on my own wiki... indeed...there they persecute me for pest control... here for "Galleries" control:-) Alas Flavio/Tigre Reietta 15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- (edited for page flow) You are not being persecuted, please stop being so melodramatic. No one here has stated you are a bad wikipedian, we just want you to follow guidelines, policy, and general agreements of each articles talk page. If you want to do some major change to an article ask on the talkpage, if no one disagrees then do it, but if consensus is "no" then leave it alone. There are ways of doing things. Galleries are not "esthetically" needed, like I said, that is what the commons tag is for, it takes the user to a whole page of images. That way the article is not cluttered up with pictures. Regards, Nashville Monkey 18:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I understand dear Nashville... but galleries are utiles for eyes :-) I'm an esthetics creature...:-) Alas, Alas no one think that I'm a good wikipedian neither on my own wiki... indeed...there they persecute me for pest control... here for "Galleries" control:-) Alas Flavio/Tigre Reietta 15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Images
Hi, sorry for the new messages you got a few minutes ago. I removed the category from the template on this page. This way your user talk won't show up in category screenshot images.
Regarding your images, you uploaded many images, Image:Tn Camac u0.gif for example, without a source. Without a source we can't verify if the image really is in the public domain like you stated. Could you add sources? Otherwise the images will eventually be deleted. Garion96 (talk) 13:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry to be the bringer of bad news, but those drawings are copyrighted. See [[1]] Also Image:Workimagethumb21.png which now mentions a free license and a fair use license. You can't have both. The image comes obviously from [2]. It wouldn't fall under fair use in wikipedia since it would fail fair use criteria #1. Garion96 (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- According to the copyright notice on fishbase copyright belongs to the original contributors, it would be impossible to contact them all. The rest of the site is non-commercial which wikipedia unfortunately doesn't accept. The only way unfortunately is to delete them, sorry. :( I will start deleting later. Garion96 (talk) 14:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think you are a vandal at all. If you added a picture of Pamela Anderson on Turkey moray I might have said differently. :) Garion96 (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- According to the copyright notice on fishbase copyright belongs to the original contributors, it would be impossible to contact them all. The rest of the site is non-commercial which wikipedia unfortunately doesn't accept. The only way unfortunately is to delete them, sorry. :( I will start deleting later. Garion96 (talk) 14:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Regardless of your intent, you are more destructive and disruptive to Wikipedia. I'm going to block you again for a month. Take this time to read the various policies that you continue to disregard. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Farewelll to all, I abandoned yours tyrannics wikiopedia... Flavio/Tigre Reietta 08:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re
[edit] for Uther
Why should you persecute me? Why should you blocked me without advertising? I do not
1)Offend no one
2)Vandalize any page
That images that my friend Garrion destroyed were illegale...of course... but I did not know that Fishbase has not legaly images... Plese do not hurt me... I have not guilt...1 month is a too hard punish... Have mercy... OR if you totaly and forever hate me...well...but in that case I suplice you to block me for ever...because after 1 month you returned to persecute me... Have honor YOU ARE A SYSOP NOT A SIMPLE USER... BUT A SYSTEM OPERATOR!! I'm withouth guilt... I swore Flavio/Tigre Reietta 14:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- I am not persecuting you. You require baby-sitting. All of your edits need to be reviewed, constantly. No one on Wikipedia should have to babysit another editor. In your zeal of posting images, you do not take the time to understand and find images that are usable, nor do you look for images that are helpful. You have been mostly unhelpful in the edits you have made. Take this time to read all of the policies and procedures and understand them. You are not without guilt. You are guilty of ignorance and guilty of immaturity and guilty of not comprehending English. These qualities combine to make you a nuisance editor. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- I've posted a bunch of very useful links at the top of this page. Read them all, particularly the policies and guidelines section. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Those are not guilties for 1 month block...I do not know well english of course... but neither you know italian... so You are guilty?
- My edits were to 98 per cent right...I want to speak with another sysop... I want to save myself...
- If I were to edit on the it.wiki, with any intention of being understood by Italian speakers, I would indeed be guilty. My only edits on it.wiki were to add interwiki tags to articles - something that does not required even the minimal comprehension of the language. You wer blocked previously for a week, to give you time to learn how to act properly. You haven't learned enough, so the block is longer. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Please give me another chance... unblock me for 1 day and if I will done anything that you think that it will be hostile to policy...well block me FOREVER... Have mercy have mercy Flavio/Tigre Reietta 14:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I love wikipedia dear Stacey and I want to contribute only for growing our splendid project...I'm very discontent that you do not comprend my good intents...alas...I do not have neither without you...:-) Bacause I think that you are a good wikipedian... alas alas you and I would be friends...but it is too late... for both...:-( alas I do not have any hope for the future... in any way... if you have a heart I supplice I SUPPLICE you to block me for everI do not have hope... Alas alas BLOCK ME FOR EVER and cut down my account... or unblock me It is your choice my dear Darkness Angel Flavio/Tigre Reietta 18:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)