Template talk:Final Fantasy character
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Laterality is more encyclopedic than bloodtype.
Bloodtype is not noticeable unless you buy players guides. So is age, height, and weight. Laterality, however, is noticeable in game. I ask, to those of you who think otherwise, have you ever played FFIV and wondered why Palom couldn't equip a weapon in his right hand like everyone else? I certainly have. Please, let's not play the "is it encyclopedic?" card here, as we're simply transplanting information, not adding or removing anything. Crazyswordsman 14:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I'd like to remove age, height, and weight, too, frankly. Blood type I mostly want kept because it's a cultural thing in Japan (read the link from blood type), but, frankly, I wouldn't mind seeing everything in these subboxes deleted as wholly unencyclopedic. I just think laterality is especially ridiculous, and shouldn't be there for the same reason I've not retained "gender" fields or "hair/eye color" fields. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC)