User talk:Fieari
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Archiving
Old talk page at User talk:Fieari/Archive 1
[edit] Megatokyo FAC
Your suggestions have been incorporated into the article. Your re-evaluation of the article would be greatly appreciated. JimmyBlackwing 20:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Early life of Jan Smuts (was Jan Smuts's youth) - FAC
Earlier this month you commented on the FAC nomination for the above article - voting against its promotion to FA status. Since then there have been a number of changes made to the article. If you have any comments to make on the article as it presently stands, before the voting period ends, then we would be very glad to hear them.
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Early life of Jan Smuts
Best wishes, Xdamrtalk 01:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Massive cull of the Parapsychology article
I went ahead and made good on your March 2006 threat to perform a "massive cull" of unsourced claims found at Parapsychology. The article has been significantly thinned out! Simões (talk/contribs) 08:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Mount_Tambora
Hi, thanks for your comment of the FAC entry. Since then, I have expanded the article to gain comprehensiveness as you mentioned. The article has 3 new sections: Eruptive History, Ecosystem and Monitoring. Could you please take a look again and give your further comments on the FAC entry? Thanks. — Indon (reply) — 10:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 |
Thanks for your suport for Mount Tambora's FAC entry. It is now featured. |
| — Indon (reply) — 11:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] MacGuffin - The Last Dragon
Hi, you deleted the information I added to the MacGuffin article about The Last Dragon because you couldn't find a cite. What kind of cite are you looking for? Like a source or something? I'll be happy to track one down and add it. Thanks! Jyroberson 23:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Scottish Parliament
You commented on this article earlier this month voting against its promotion to FAC status because of the lack of inline citations. There are significantly more inline citations - at least one per paragraph and it has its own reference section. Unfortunately after this length of time the article only has one recorded vote and I'd be very greatful if you could take a look at it again and give your opinion. Thanks Globaltraveller 19:39, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
I just noticed that you'd placed Chicago for FA status after I'd had some difficulties with the process. I was a little new at the time and I really appreciate you helping out, even though the run was clearly the wrong move. Thanks very much for the support! Mrmaroon25 05:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] MOS (writing about fiction)
In the past you have participated in discussion about this guideline, or voted in it's acceptence. There is currently a discussion about a partial rewrite of this guideline. The discussion could benefit from some more input. Thank you for your contributions. TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 16:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Matrix Scheme
Fieari, Not sure if you can help, but the Matrix Scheme article is continuously being reverted by Cybertrax. There is disagreement over valid external links, and since his link has been deemed unworthy he feels that the Matrixwatch link is not valid either and is continualy deleting it. Any help would be great, or perhaps a nudge in the right direction. Arzel 14:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Revived discussion concerning fair use in portals
I am contacting everyone who participated in the discussion that became inactive in December. Due to the length of the previous discussion, I have proposed a new amendment and you like you to weigh in so that we may actually have a consensus on this matter as it doesn't seem there exists one either way. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria
