User talk:FictionH

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This user's request to have the autoblock on their IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

My autoblock was by mistake, because me and my son share the same PC, and I happened to register around when he got blocked.

Please follow these instructions. Also, do we have your word that your son will no longer vandalise the Wikipedia? — Yamla 21:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Note: declined unblock requests may only be removed after two days or when the block has expired.

Yes, he says that he won't. FictionH 21:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Best Day Ever

This episode does nto have a rank in the countdown. It was not voted upon, and why would it be better thatn all episodes excapt one if it wasnt even aired? -AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message) 22:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Yes it does. It was shown between #1 and #2. So it's #1.5. FictionH 23:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Was it voted upon? No. Did anyone get a chance to see it before they considered it was better than all episodes except Karate Island? No. Is the Movie considered to be #0.5, #0, or #-1? No. -AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message) 01:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dan (South Park character)

Please do not consider creation of this page vandalism, as I work for Comedy Central and we have decided to create this character. FictionH 20:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Comedy Central is not responsible for the characters on South Park, that would be a decision made by Matt or Trey at South Park Studios. Tweeks Coffee 20:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you provide a source for your claim, FictionH? The article as it stands is not verifiable, and I have therefore nominated both Dan (South Park character) and New Student: Dan for deletion per our policies Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you can provide reliable published sources for this information, then I will withdraw my nominations for deletion. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
    • I can't prove it, but we've also talked to Matt and Trey and they are gonna help us. But, don't believe it if you don't want to. FictionH 01:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
      • It really has nothing to do with whether or not I or anybody else "believes" it. We've got a policy called Wikipedia:Verifiability which is non-negotiable. If you're providing information that's not verifiable, then it'll get removed, per policy. That's just not what we're trying to collect here. -GTBacchus(talk) 02:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
        • If you want to delete it, fine with me, you're right, it isn't verifiable, even though it is one thing: true. FictionH 21:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New Student: Dan

See above at Dan (South Park character) for info about this article not being vandalism. FictionH 20:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cite your sources on SpongeBob SquarePants (character)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to SpongeBob SquarePants (character). If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Squirepants101 14:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

But Stephen Hillenburg told me his birthday was May 19. FictionH 15:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Has that been published anywhere? If so, here are some sources that are appropiate for Wikipedia. If it hasn't, then it would be considered original research. Squirepants101 15:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I saw it on TV a few months after the show's original release. He told me the same thing when I interviewed him in 2004. FictionH 15:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Was this interview posted online somewhere? Squirepants101 15:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes. I posted on my website, unfortunately the website is gone now. FictionH 15:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

The relevant question is, has it been published somewhere that our readers may verify it? We aren't trying to collect information that people can't verify by following up on the sources we provide. That's the point of our policies on verifiability and reliable sources. -GTBacchus(talk) 17:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User page

Hi. I noticed you put some content on your userpage that's been removed. Please read WP:UP, our guideline on user pages. Also, I can say that the Category:1969 births is a category we use for encyclopedia articles, not for editors, so that really is inappropriate on a user page. Categories that are appropriate for user pages tend to have the word "Wikipedian" in their name. -GTBacchus(talk) 18:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Don't try to *@^k with me! FictionH 18:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
    • I'm absolutely not trying to mess with you, FictionH. Are you willing to comply with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, or not? We have categories for users, and we have categories for articles, and we don't mix the two. Do you object to that system? -GTBacchus(talk) 18:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Fine, but the images MUST stay. FictionH 18:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
        • Would you rather get Wikipedia sued than play by the same rules everybody else plays by? Please read Wikipedia:Fair use, and consider that we have good reasons for trying to keep our project on the good side of the law. -GTBacchus(talk) 18:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
          • By that logic, go here and delete the Larry image, as well as the others since that's a userpage. FictionH 18:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
            • First of all, I haven't been deleting your images (I just removed the article category). I don't know enough about the details of fair use to take on that task; I'm just aware that the issue exists. Secondly, the article you link to is pretty clearly a draft version of an article, which is quite a bit different from an ordinary userpage saying, "hi, this is who I am, and here's a non-free image of my favorite SpongeBob character." Do what you like; if you keep the images on your page, I wouldn't be surprised if they're removed again by some completely unrelated editor, or maybe nobody will notice, and you'll get to keep your non-free images. I don't really care one way or the other, but at least now you're been pointed to the relevant guidelines. Good day to you. -GTBacchus(talk) 18:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
              • GtBacchus was right. Someone did try to remove the images again and you reverted his/her edit, stating that user vandalised your page. That was not vandalism (other users have had images on their userpage and they were removed). You shouldn't even have those fair use images on your userpage in the first place. It is against a Wikipedia policy that is considered a standard that all users should follow. This includes you. You can put freely licensed images on your userpage, though. See Wikipedia:Userpage#What_can_I_not_have_on_my_user_page.3F for more info. Squirepants101 20:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Atomic1609 21:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

What did I do? FictionH 21:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

He may have been referring to your edit summary on this edit, in which you referred to him as a "vandal". Removing unfree images from a user page in order to protect Wikipedia from copyright violations is pretty much not vandalism, and people are touchy about "the v-word" here.
Generally, if you think someone might be doing something to mess with you, it's helpful to ask them why they did it before assuming it's vandalism. They might have a good reason, and they might be happy to explain it.
As for getting blocked, don't worry too much. Just keep your interactions at Wikipedia peaceable and respectful, and you'll be fine. People who fly off the handle often don't last long around here. -GTBacchus(talk) 03:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You have been reported to WP:ANI

You have been reported to WP:ANI mainly because of your refusal to let others remove the fair use images off your talk page. Squirepants101 22:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Too bad you're too late now that they're no longer on my page. FictionH 22:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../f/i/c/User_talk%7EFictionH_84e2.html"