Talk:Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] template for Orthopaedic Conditions
Suggested template for Orthopaedic Conditions (see Talk:Orthopedic surgery) is
Name
Definition
Synonyms
Incidence
Pathogenesis
Pathology
Stages
Classification
Natural History/Untreated Prognosis
Clinical Features
Investigation
Non-Operative Treatment
Risks of Non-Operative Treatment
Prognosis following Non-Operative Treatment
Operative Treatment (Note that each operations should have its own wiki entry)
Risks of Operative Treatment
Prognosis Post Operation
Complications
Management
Prevention
History
--Mylesclough 05:38, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Statistics
This site says 2,500 have been reported (1 in 2,000,000) to date. The most recent date is April 23, 2006.
http://www.usbjd.org/projects/project_op.cfm?dirID=142
Stovetopcookies 08:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Qwantz
This disease was features in today's Qwantz would it be appropriate to create a Popular Culture section and mention it?
No. I came here because of the mention in Qwantz as well, but I don't think that nearly relevantNjerseyguy 20:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Myositis ossificans
The article on myositis ossificans says that the ossification in the progressiva type of myositis ossificans (which this article refers to as fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva) does not require injury, and develops in a predictable pattern, which seems to contradict this article. Can anyone help clear this up? Dancter 22:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
From what I remember from a friend that has FOP is that ossification can both occur because of injury, but injury does not always result in ossification and can also happen without an apparent cause. It also seems to vary somewhat from case to case with ossification occurring at vary different rates from person to person. Lonjers 01:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Contradictory info from Discovery Health
Note that the info from Discovery disagrees with the 'Statistics' above. Until someone finds a published source, please stop reverting unconfirmable information you saw on cable. Cable show are not good sources for an encyclopedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lord Kelvin (talk • contribs) 01:17, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] misspelling of title
i have seen this spelled fibrodysplasia ossificans progessiva,
progessiva instead of progressiva. can anyone verify this?
Jbpanther20 00:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)jbpanther20
Sounds to me like it's simply a misspelling.WizardofOskemen 22:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Yea, "progressiva" refers to the progressive nature of the disease. See the International Fibrodysplasia Ossificans progressiva Association webpage. Njerseyguy 20:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Excellent pictute.
A haunting picture of a cadaver side by side with its overgrown skeleton is available here (google image frame. The original page is here. Anyone with some time might want to add the photo or at least link to it. Njerseyguy
On a side note, I can't spell worth a damn Njerseyguy 20:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mr. Eastlack's Case
The "cases" section of this article starts talking about someone named "Mr. Eastlack." The second paragraph starts referring to someone who can only move their lips, but never says their name. The third paragraph mentions a "Mr. Eastlack." Is Mr. Eastlack the person from the second paragraph? Does Mr. Eastlack have a full name? Is he worth mentioning? Please, REWRITE THIS SECTION.
(No, I'm not a real doctor)
Dr. Mordecai 01:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
