User talk:Felsir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Felsir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 14:17, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. :)

In this case, you should be bold and add the {{Merge}} tag to the top of the cleft palate and cleft lip articles. Then, post an argument in favor of the merging on both the articles' talk pages; some of the information you added here was very convincing. Please see Template:Merge for what the tag looks like. Oh, and please also check what links to the Merge template to view examples of how the tag is used. If you need further assistance, please don't hesitate to bug me. :) Sango123 14:17, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
Well done! That was quick. Sango123 17:20, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Oosterscheldekering

Hi, nice work on the article! I only noticed after my second edit or so that you had written it all by yourself. I hope you didn't mind my comment re: 'could use copyediting by a native speaker', that was absolutely not meant in a negative way! --JoanneB 12:00, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

No offence taken! In fact, I'm happy that you corrected my mistakes - all the better for the quality of the article. Thanks Felsir 12:04, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Craniofacial Team

I've moved this to Craniofacial team and corrected the double redirect on Cleft but left your user page alone. Cheers.
brenneman(t)(c) 00:42, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Frits Philips

Hi, in the article Frits Philips the cleanup-verify tag was added. I do understand the reason for this, however I have a few questions about it. I am born in Eindhoven, much of the information is from the local newspaper. Since Frits was very popular his 100th birthday -and his recent death many articles were printed in the paper "Eindhovens Dagblad"[1]. I tried to add as many checkable sources with ISBN numbers. What is needed to give the article 'verified' status? What sections need verification or a source citation? Felsir 08:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

As a general rule of thumb, it is good to have at least two independent sources cited within every article on Wikipedia. This assists other editors by allowing them to verify the accuracy of the text and allow them to expand the article further as well. What you did was perfect, so I've gone ahead and removed the cleanup-verify tag. Best regards, Hall Monitor 17:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Mandyhaberman.jpg

Hello. Please explain why this image was released in the public domain. Thanks. --Edcolins 13:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

I e-mailed Mandy Haberman for details on her biography. She pointed me at the imagebank downloadable at her site[2]. I asked her if it was useable and she told me that the images at the imagebank were available for everyone as long as used unaltered and within the right context. So I figured, if it is free for download and use, it's public domain. The Haberman feeder image is from the same imagebank. Felsir 14:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Contd on Image talk:Mandyhaberman.jpg. --Edcolins 16:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:CleftLip3.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CleftLip3.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 03:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Fixed it. Since I made the image myself I added the PD-self template. Felsir 07:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VWN en WCN

Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org . Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, effeietsanders 13:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Cleft

I thought you would be interested in the latest post (at the bottom of that page) about renaming.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. Felsir 23:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Habermanfeeder.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Habermanfeeder.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Sherool (talk) 13:31, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Since my son's nutricion depends on a Habermanfeeder, I'll take a picture of the bottle I have at home. I assumed a publicly available press-kit image (which is subject to a fair use policy) supplied by Mandy Haberman herself would classify as a valid image for Wikipedia. I fail to see why an image I took myself would be better than one supplied for the purpose to show what a Haberman feeder bottle looks like. BTW. this has been subject for discussion before (see [3]) Felsir 13:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Wapenstoedenrode.png, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 16:42, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


A tag has been placed on Media Molecule, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tikiwont 10:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../f/e/l/User_talk%7EFelsir_a69a.html"