Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Featured log/October 2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

edit2006
April 1 promoted 6 failed
October 4 promoted 2 failed
December 1 promoted 2 failed 1 addition
2007
January 2 promoted 7 failed
February 1 promoted 2 failed 1 removed
March 1 promoted 4 failed 1 removed

Contents

[edit] Final Fantasy titles

All of the following articles are both related (in that they are articles on major games in the Final Fantasy series) as well as in good quality, as they consist of mostly either featured or good articles).--TBCΦtalk? 17:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Main page(s) Articles
Final Fantasy titles Final Fantasy, Final Fantasy II, Final Fantasy III, Final Fantasy IV, Final Fantasy V, Final Fantasy VI, Final Fantasy VII, Final Fantasy VIII, Final Fantasy IX, Final Fantasy X, Final Fantasy X-2, Final Fantasy XI, Final Fantasy XII, Final Fantasy Mystic Quest
SupportWeak object; Final Fantasy Adventure includes sections marked as stubs. All other articles are excellent, though. Laïka 17:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
I've removed Final Fantasy Adventure from the above group of articles because: a) as you've mentioned, some sections are still stubs b) it really isn't a major game in the series.--TBCΦtalk? 18:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Then I'll support! Laïka 20:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Halloween film series

All of the following articles are both related (in that they are articles on major movies in the Halloween series) as well as in good quality, as they consist of featured articles.--TBCΦtalk? 18:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Main page(s) Articles
Halloween film series Halloween (film), Halloween II, Halloween III: Season of the Witch
  • Support enthusiastically. All featured, and all in excellent shape. Tuf-Kat 22:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Solar System

All of the following articles are both related (in that they are articles on major astronomical objects in the Solar System) as well as in good quality, as they consist of mostly featured or good articles.--TBCΦtalk? 19:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Main page(s) Articles
Solar System Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Ceres, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, Eris
Support Well written and consistant. Laïka 20:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
'Support Very good, but Saturn and Jupiter might need a little work to catch up to the others. Tobyk777 06:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Object on the basis that Saturn and Jupiter are in need of cleanup. Saturn has a cleanup tag and Jupiter's lead is wholly insufficient. Both are also underreferenced (as is Neptune and maybe more). Ceres (dwarf planet) and Earth also too listy (i.e. need more organizing into paragraphs with a logical flow). I don't think they should all have to be perfect for this to be a FT, but those are some pretty major problems. Tuf-Kat 22:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Supplementary nominations

  1. Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Solar System/addition1
  2. Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Solar System/addition2
  3. Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Solar System/addition3

[edit] Star Wars episodes

All of the following articles are both related (in that they are articles on major movies in the Star Wars eries) as well as in good quality, as they mostly consist of either featured or good articles.--TBCΦtalk? 18:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Main page(s) Articles
Star Wars episodes Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope, Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back, Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi
The Prequel triglogy are all FAs, wow. A new hope looks pretty good too. I am concerned about 5 and 6 though. They are fine articles but underreffrenced. I will support since 3 out of 6 are FAs and one is a GA. I also thought that certain member of the Star Wars project were trying to make all of these FAs. They will probably imporve more. I would love this to be a FT since I love Star Wars. Tobyk777 06:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I'll support too, though I agree with Tobyk777's comments about the underreferencing. They're all in pretty good shape - no trivia sections! and are generally cogent and without excessive fancruft. Tuf-Kat 22:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Supplementary nominations

  1. Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Star Wars episodes/addition1