Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kremlin Wall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Moscow skyline
Beautiful image taken which shows landmarks and roads of Moscow. It was created by Wikimedia Commons user, Azov.
- Nominate and support. - Thorpe | talk 19:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. I agree. Zarniwoot 23:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support but please clarify the pictures description. What are the church bridge and highrise in the skyline? Would make it much more informative! --Dschwen 23:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Like this one better than the previous "Kremlin sky"... --Janke | Talk 08:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Very pretty picture. drumguy8800 - speak? 23:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Interesting, but too dark for my liking.... Spawn Man 03:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. The darkness adds an important mood to it. Dylan 04:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Main subject underexposed and upper right sky utterly blown.--Deglr6328 10:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - very grand and encompasing. Almost makes me fell like I'm their. JQF 20:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- (+)Support Halibutt 01:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. As noted above, the sky on the upper-right is washed out. enochlau (talk) 09:12, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- ( − ) Oppose Much prefer the previous kremlin photo --Fir0002 22:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose under exposed. chowells 22:22, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Great picture with lots of content. I love the mix in skyline with the great sky behind it. --Lewk_of_Serthic 03:35, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - too dark -.- Chris 73 | Talk 15:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - agree with Chris 73 - it's too dark, the late/early daytime did not really help this time --Mikeo 20:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - A nice addition to the article, shows the landmarks in reltion to each other. Eyesclosed 17:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. I'm not convinced that this is the best representation of the Moscow skyline. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Not promoted Raven4x4x 07:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)