Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Daffodil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Daffodil

I think this shot captures the unique structure of an ordinary Daffodil. This photograph was taken during a visit to Longwood Gardens, Pennsylvania. This picture appears in the article: "Daffodils."

• Nominate and support. - 67.33.193.152 15:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Above user "67.33.193.152" is a confirmed sockpuppet. --Aude (talk | contribs) 21:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Support. What an awesome position to take a picture of such a small flower! A little dark, but what an awesome photograph!!!!!! It looks great. I love the detail! Christine

Above user "Polarqueen"/"Christine" is a confirmed sockpuppet. --Aude (talk | contribs) 21:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Oppose great photograph but it's dark. Anonymous__Anonymous 15:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weakly support Oppose. This photograph has bad framing, shadow, and light. Garrett Rock 16:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose - cropped too tight, ordinary composition. --P199 16:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose both versions. Grainy, subject cut off, original too dark. --Pharaoh Hound 19:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose Could have been much better with lighting. I'm tempted to show one of my own daffodils, although it's probably even worse. deeptrivia (talk) 19:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Yes, your picture is much worse. Don't criticize me until you have a better picture. Thanks:)

• Hey, be civil. There was no need to be rude. --Pharaoh Hound 20:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Comment: You're right, Pharaoh's hound. There should be more peace in this world, like you. Thanks for spreading the love! :) In fact, maybe none of us should criticize each other's work, since none of us are professionals, anyway, and we all have different tastes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cd78 (talk • contribs).

Above user "Cd78" is a confirmed sockpuppet. --Aude (talk | contribs) 21:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

If you don't want your photo criticised, this is probably not the right place to promote it. Stevage 10:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

• Oppose Picture is way too dark. --Mad Max 21:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment This should be closed, the photo is not going to be promoted and the nominator seems to be using sockpuppets to help boost the pictures support. --Mad Max 21:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. How do you know? Don't influence other voters please.
• Oppose. Too blurry/grainy. Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 20:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose The whole pic is slightly blurry which spoils it for me - Adrian Pingstone 20:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose Picture is somewhat less than crisp --Fir0002 09:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Not promoted