Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/February 2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

edit2005
June	13 promoted	10 failed
July	20 promoted	8 failed
August	14 promoted	9 failed
September	3 promoted	8 failed
October	7 promoted	2 failed
November	7 promoted	6 failed	1 removed
December	6 promoted	4 failed
2006
January	12 promoted	11 failed	1 removed
February	3 promoted	8 failed
March	13 promoted	11 failed
April	10 promoted	5 failed	1 removed
May	10 promoted	7 failed
June	9 promoted	10 failed
July	10 promoted	9 failed
August	10 promoted	7 failed
September	5 promoted	7 failed
October	8 promoted	10 failed	1 removed
November	11 promoted	8 failed
December	20 promoted	11 failed
2007
January	18 promoted	11 failed
February	11 promoted	11 failed
March	12 promoted	10 failed

[edit] Swedish football champions

Self-nom. Accurate list, not really much to add. -- Elisson • Talk 19:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• Object:
  1. Should be called List of Swedish football champions or something similar.
  2. List repeatedly uses football team logos, which are only allowed here under fair use. Wikipedia's fair use policy only allows such material under various rules and restrictions, one of which (#8) is: The material must contribute significantly to the article (e.g. identify the subject of an article, or specifically illustrate relevant points or sections within the text) and must not serve a purely decorative purpose. The use of logos here is purely decorative and should be removed. Qwghlm 20:43, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• 1. There is no criterion saying featured lists need to be named like that, see for example Counties of Lithuania or Australian national cricket captains. The reasons I did not name the article "List of Swedish football champions" were two, firstly, because the article is not only about the list of winners, but also about the title itself, secondly, because the articles on Austrian champions (football) and German champions (football) were named this way (although I now see that this article should be moved to lowercase "champions", or the two other to uppercase "champions").
  2. Fixed. And it was a pain in the ass to do it. ;) -- Elisson • Talk 21:42, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• 1. At very least, make it Swedish football champions - that makes more grammatical sense and is a likelier search term.
  2. Thank you. Sorry for the pain - I should have perhaps been bold and done it myself... Qwghlm 21:56, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• 1. Makes more sense to me as well... :) Moved. -- Elisson • Talk 22:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Objections dealt with - change vote to Support. Qwghlm 22:55, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• Support. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 19:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support if not too late :) Renata 05:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Note: Please leave this nomination here until 19:30, 21 February 2006 to allow more people to express their opinion on this list -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 11:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Category 5 Pacific hurricanes

Self renomination. The list has been changed to resolve issues brought up during the previous nomination by adding inline cites, removing whitespace, and expanding the prose parts. As this is a dynamic list, additional Category 5's will have to be added as they form, but the list is 100 percent complete up to now. There are no redlinks, several references, and many gorgeous pictures. Truly a featured list. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:32, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

The table in section "Listed by minimum pressure" is not aligned consistantly. Also is this really a list and not an article? Rmhermen 04:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

All entries in tables are center-aligned now. I think that this is a list because the key information in the article is the 3 lists. Although it would be somewhat of an interesting choice to nominate it to FLC; I'd probably have to move it to Category 5 Pacific hurricane (currently a redirect). Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 19:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Support. All the commentary in the article is excellent. However, the web references (and notes!) still need a bit more work, see for instance Wikipedia:Cite_sources/example_style#Web_sites_and_articles_.28not_from_periodicals.29. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 15:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

I added dates for the notes. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 19:24, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

• Support. I would consider nominating it to the Featured article page since it contains complete informations alongside the lists. CG 17:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support excellent work! Durova 03:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support Very impressive. Brisvegas 11:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of municipalities of Lithuania

Self-nom. I re-wrote this article from scratch. See this version before me. I have been working on this since August! It is comprehensive, accurate, all images are free, there are some red links, but they are going to be "blued" in near future. Counties of Lithuania got featured not that long ago so it would be nice to see its sister getting featured too. Any suggestions are welcome! Renata 23:45, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

• Support -- just change Currently Lithuania... to Lithuania. =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks and... done :) Renata 15:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support - nice work. --Tone 16:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support. Very nice, very nice indeed. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 17:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support looks like featured work. Durova 16:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support. Beautiful work. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 17:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support. Well done yet again. —Nightstallion (?) 11:45, 8 February 2006 (UTC)