Wikipedia:Featured article review/Seabiscuit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Seabiscuit

[edit] Review commentary

Message left at GWO. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Messages left at Seabiscuit and Thoroughbred racing.

Doesn't satisfy 1(c). One source, and for something that barely matters in the article. Doesn't really satisfy 1(a) either. Jerichi~Profile~Talk~ 15:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Jerichi. We don't "sup", "opp", "rm" or "kp" at this point. We try for a couple weeks of commentary, and hopefully improvements, and then move the review to FARC. Marskell 16:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
My bad. I'm a little new to the Featured Article area; I tend to work more around the GA area. Jerichi~Profile~Talk~ 19:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • remove there are no secondary sources, and only one thing is sourced.--Sefringle 20:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FARC commentary

Suggested FA criteria concern is citations (1c), and prose (1a). Marskell 08:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Additional concern There are two unfree images, neither of which contain a fair use rationale. Jay32183 18:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Remove for deficiency of references. -- King of 18:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Remove per 1c. Send me a message if things change drastically change. Quadzilla99 09:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)