Wikipedia:Featured article review/Order of the Thistle/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was kept 20:51, 5 March 2007.

[edit] Order of the Thistle

Messages left at Lord Emsworth, Numismatics and Scotland. LuciferMorgan 22:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Last of the "Order" articles, needs inline citations, perhaps more references. Judgesurreal777 21:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Sigh, I knew this one was going to come up. I'd hoped to be able to cite it before it got this FAR. I had already sourced some statements, which I've added, and got some images which I'll add later. I'll do what I can, but as always am quite busy. I won't have a chance to check references before the weekend. Dr pda 00:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it was due eventually. But no worries Dr. Your work is appreciated, and it can be as your time allows. Marskell 20:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, I've added the images and cited most of the article now. I've put {{fact}} tags for the statements which still need citations; the Precendence and privileges section is also currently uncited. Anyone's welcome to try to fix these. Dr pda 00:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I filled them, apart from one which stated that the offices of Dean of the Order and Dean of the Chapel Royal were split in 1969. I couldn't find a reference for that outside of our articles and mirrors, so I've commented it out. Yomangani^talk 01:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

That's been cited too now. Yomangani^talk 23:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• Status — looks like this one is coming along quite well. I'll provide some detailed ideas once I get a chance. — Deckiller 22:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

I've cited the Chapel and Precendence and privileges sections, and tagged the few remaining facts which need a reference. Dr pda 00:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I've cited those (although I removed one which seemed to be obvious from the next sentence). Yomangani^talk 15:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Anymore work needed here? Marskell 11:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

The article's fully cited now, and as a result the number of references has increased. These are the only two issues which had been raised, so I think we're done. Dr pda 01:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.