Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/OpenOffice.org

There are a lot of good references throughout the article, and it is very clear on the subject. Also a good use of tables.

Yeti man5 23:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Object, Still has a stub section and a trivia section, so not quite there yet. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 15:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Object Too listy, which creates disjointed prose (1. a. violation). LuciferMorgan 00:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Object. It's too listy; the citations are not quite good enough (in the "History" section especially); the trivia section should go (see WP:TRIVIA and WP:TRIV); it has a stubsection; it fails 1a (too much jargon in places) and, more importantly, it fails 1b. Mikker ^(...) 03:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)