Falsified evidence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Criminal defenses |
---|
Part of the common law series |
Defenses to crime |
Actual innocence |
Excuse and exculpation |
Defenses that deny the act: |
Alibi · Mistaken identity |
Frameup · Falsified evidence |
False confession · Automatism |
Defenses that negate intent: |
Infancy · Entrapment |
Insanity · Mental disorder |
M'Naghten Rules |
Diminished responsibility |
Mistake of law · Mistake of fact |
Intoxication |
Defenses that justify the act: |
Self defense · Consent |
Duress · Necessity |
Provocation |
See also Criminal Law |
Criminal Procedure |
Other areas of the common law |
Contract law · Tort law · Property law |
Wills and trusts · Evidence |
Portals: Law · Criminal justice |
Falsified evidence, forged evidence or tainted evidence is used to either convict an innocent person, or to guarantee conviction of a guilty person. Some evidence is forged because the person doing the forensic work finds it easier to fabricate evidence than to perform the actual work involved. The planting of a gun at a crime scene would be used by the police to justify a shooting, and avoid possible prosecution for manslaughter.
Contents |
[edit] New York State Police Troop C scandal
In the New York State Police Troop C scandal of 1993, Craig D. Harvey a New York State Police trooper was charged with fabricating evidence. Harvey admitted he and another trooper lifted fingerprints from items the suspect, John Spencer, touched while in Troop C headquarters during booking. He attached the fingerprints to evidence cards and later claimed that he had pulled the fingerprints from the scene of the murder. The forged evidence was used during trial and John Spencer was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison.
[edit] FBI Crime Lab scandal
In the 1990s, the fingerprint, DNA, and explosive units of the FBI Crime Lab had written reports confirming local police department theories without actually performing the work.
[edit] See also
- Miscarriage of justice
- Testilying
- False arrest
- Intimidation
- Surveillance abuse
- M62 Coach Bombing
- Fingerprints
- Howland will forgery trial
[edit] References
- National Law Journal; October 9, 1995; "Faked Evidence Becomes Real Problem-From Fingerprints to Photos to Computer Data, Lawyers are Learning to be Vigilant"
- New York Times; November 22, 1992, Sunday; "Ripples of a Pathologist's Misconduct In Graves and Courts of West Texas. The prairie graveyards of West Texas are giving mute testimony to the misdeeds of a circuit-riding pathologist who left a trail of faked autopsies, botched blood samples and missing organs from the Panhandle to the Rio Grande. According to defense lawyers' estimates, as many as 20 capital murder cases ..."
- John F. Kelly and Phillip K. Wearne; Tainting Evidence: Inside The Scandals At The FBI Crime Lab