Talk:Fairstead, Norfolk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does anyone agree with me that the article in question is prejudiced to the hilt? Fairstead is not, in fact, as violent as it has been portrayed. I doubt the author of the article has been there more than on one or two occasions, and has read newspapers to gather information, instead of actually experiencing it. The content seems so artificial, it may be a council estate, but it is NOT however the living hell the author is portraying it as.

Advice to the author: Go there. You may be pleasantly surprised.

The article is prejudiced to the hilt, certainly, and the tone is highly unencyclopaedic (and it needs some major grammar checking); but the fact does remain that setting foot on the estate in anything other than a Sherman tank is only for the brave, the stupid or the desperate. Yes, it's not as bad as it used to be; but then, neither is Moss Side and that's still got a reputation... Kinitawowi 15:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to report that there is little or no NPOV in this article. It seems to contain prejudice and a high amount of bias. 84.64.206.174 21:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

in response to the author, me and friends are very pleased to read someone telling it like it is. in response to GO THERE YOU MAY BE PLEASENTLY SURPRISED's comment, you obviously have seen the posh bit. i am not currently living there but will be returning home in a week or two and will definately add some images to this if you seriously believe that, you need to be show some stuff it will help with your delusion/denial Fairsteadlass 00:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)