Talk:Fairchild-Dornier 328 family

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aviation, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles related to aviation. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.	Aviation Portal
Template:Aircraft-project=yes-Class	This article has been rated as Aircraft-project=yes-Class on the quality scale. (comments)
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

[edit] Merger

I think this article should be merged with the Fairchild_328-article to a new Fairchild-Dornier_328-article. Minkus 14:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

I am merging these articles together. I found Fairchild 328, Dornier 328, and Dornier 328 Aircraft, all of which covered the same aircraft! —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 02:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about your stomped edit, Bill. I was editing the fully-merged version at the time. I'm sure you understand. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 03:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

It's OK. I had found some of the Fairchild Dornier articles, and was planning to work on them tonight, but I went to take a shower first. WHen I got back, you had already changed half of them and were working on the rest! Thanks! What you've done looks good. - BillCJ 03:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)