Factoradic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Numeral systems by culture | |
---|---|
Hindu-Arabic numerals | |
Western Arabic Eastern Arabic Khmer |
Indian family Brahmi Thai |
East Asian numerals | |
Chinese Japanese |
Korean |
Alphabetic numerals | |
Abjad Armenian Cyrillic Ge'ez |
Hebrew Ionian/Greek Sanskrit |
Other systems | |
Attic Etruscan Urnfield Roman |
Babylonian Egyptian Mayan |
List of numeral system topics | |
Positional systems by base | |
Decimal (10) | |
2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 | |
3, 9, 12, 24, 30, 36, 60, more… | |
In combinatorial mathematics, the factoradic is a specially constructed number. Factoradics provide a lexicographical index for permutations, so they have potential application to computer security. The idea of the factoradic is closely linked to that of the Lehmer code. Dr. James D. McCaffrey has posted an article on MSDN documenting the factoradic index for permutations with supporting code written in C#. The origins of the term 'factoradic' are obscure. In his article he acknowledges Dr. Peter Cameron of Queen Mary, University of London, as having made the original suggestion.
Contents |
[edit] Definition
- factoradic
- the unique factorial-based mixed radix numeral system
radix: | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
place value: | 7! | 6! | 5! | 4! | 3! | 2! | 1! | 0! |
in decimal: | 5040 | 720 | 120 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
In this numbering system, the rightmost digit is always 0, the second 0, or 1, the third 0, 1 or 2 and so on. There also exists a variant of the Factoradic system where the rightmost number is omitted because it is always zero (sequence A007623 in OEIS).
[edit] Examples
The first twenty-four factoradic numbers are
decimal | factoradic |
110 | 1100 |
210 | 120100 |
310 | 121100 |
410 | 220100 |
510 | 221100 |
610 | 13020100 |
710 | 13021100 |
810 | 13120100 |
910 | 13121100 |
1010 | 13220100 |
1110 | 13221100 |
1210 | 23020100 |
1310 | 23021100 |
1410 | 23120100 |
1510 | 23121100 |
1610 | 23220100 |
1710 | 23221100 |
1810 | 33020100 |
1910 | 33021100 |
2010 | 33120100 |
2110 | 33121100 |
2210 | 33220100 |
2310 | 33221100 |
For another example, the biggest number that could be represented with six digits would be 554433221100 which equals 719 in decimal:
- 5×5! + 4×4! + 3×3! + 2×2! + 1×1! + 0×0!.
Clearly the next factoradic number after 554433221100 is 16050403020100. But this is equal to 6!, the place value for the radix 7 digit. So the previous number, and its summed out expression above, is equal to:
- 6! − 1.
The factoradic numbering system is unambiguous. No number can be represented in more than one way because the sum of consecutive factorials multiplied by their index is always the next factorial minus one:
This can be easily proved with mathematical induction.
However, using arabic numerals to write the digits, their simple concatenation becomes ambiguous for numbers having a "digit" bigger than 9. The smallest such example is the number 10×10!, written 101009080706050403020100 while 11! is 11101009080706050403020100. Thus adding a single subscript to denote notation in factoriadic system (as it is done for the base-10 notation above) is not possible for numbers with more than 10 digits. Using letters A-Z to denote digits 10,...,35 as in other base-N systems raises this limit to 35×35!
[edit] Permutations
There is a natural mapping between the integers 0, ..., n! − 1 (or equivalently the factoradic numbers with n digits) and permutations of n elements in lexicographical order, when the integers are expressed in factoradic form. This mapping has been termed the Lehmer code or Lucas-Lehmer code (inversion table). For example, with n = 3, such a mapping is
decimal | factoradic | permutation |
010 | 020100 | (0,1,2) |
110 | 021100 | (0,2,1) |
210 | 120100 | (1,0,2) |
310 | 121100 | (1,2,0) |
410 | 220100 | (2,0,1) |
510 | 221100 | (2,1,0) |
where the leftmost factoradic digit 0, 1, or 2 selects itself for the first permutation digit from the ordered list (0,1,2) of digits and removes itself from the list, creating a list one shorter missing the first permutation digit. The second factoradic digit if "0" then selects for the second permutation digit the first (0-indexed) digit from the shorter list and removes it, or if "1" selects the second (1-indexed) digit from the shorter list and removes it. The third factoradic digit must be "0", but by now the list is only one item long, so that last remaining item is selected as the last permutation digit.
The process may become clearer with a longer example. For example, here is how the digits in the factoradic 46054413020100 pick out the digits in the permutation (4,0,6,2,1,3,5).
46054413020100 → (4,0,6,2,1,3,5) factoradic: 46 05 44 13 02 01 00 | | | | | | | (0,1,2,3,4,5,6) -> (0,1,2,3,5,6) -> (1,2,3,5,6) -> (1,2,3,5) -> (1,3,5) -> (3,5) -> (5) | | | | | | | permutation:(4, 0, 6, 2, 1, 3, 5)
Of course the natural index for the group direct product of two permutation groups is just the factoradics for the two groups joined using concatenation.
concatenated decimal factoradics permutation pair 010 020100020100 ((0,1,2),(0,1,2)) 110 020100021100 ((0,1,2),(0,2,1)) ... 510 020100221100 ((0,1,2),(2,1,0)) 610 021100020100 ((0,2,1),(0,1,2)) 710 021100021100 ((0,2,1),(0,2,1)) ... 2210 121100220100 ((1,2,0),(2,0,1)) ... 3410 221100220100 ((2,1,0),(2,0,1)) 3510 221100221100 ((2,1,0),(2,1,0))
[edit] References
- Donald Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms, Third Edition. Addison-Wesley, 1997. ISBN 0-201-89684-2. Pages 65–66.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- "Using Permutations in .NET for Improved Systems Security", by Dr. James McCaffrey. Implementation of factoradics in C# source code
- Peter Cameron's Home Page McCaffrey acknowledges Cameron as having first suggested to him using factoradics to index permutations.
- "A permutation representation that knows what 'Eulerian' means", by Roberto Mantaci and Fanja Rakotondrajao. (PDF) Description and references for Lehmer codes
- A Lehmer code calculator Note that their permutation digits start from 1, so mentally reduce all permutation digits by one to get results equivalent to the ones on this page.