Talk:ExpressJet Airlines
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Houston, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the city of Houston. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
this stub is already covered in much more detail under Continental Express.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nelgallan (talk • contribs) 11:59, 29 July 2005 (UTC-8)
So do you want me to just redirect expressJet to Continental Express? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bkissin (talk • contribs) 05:01, 30 July 2005 (UTC-8)
Contents |
[edit] merging
+Mion 03:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] code
same Icao code —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mion (talk • contribs) 20:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC-8)
[edit] what ?
expressJet is the holding, Continental Express is the public name. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mion (talk • contribs) 20:17, 11 February 2006 (UTC-8)
[edit] Suggest
dump ExpressJet —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mion (talk • contribs) 20:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC-8)
[edit] Suggest
I think that for now They should be merged under the name Continental express. and in the topic say a large amount of flights are operated by expressjet (or something like that) and in the highly unlikely event that expressjet leaves continental, then they will be un-merged. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.249.245.130 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC-8)
[edit] Suggest
Since ExpressJet is currently in the process of evaluatng whether or not to return 69 of its aircraft to Continental, it is possible that the airline could end up operating a substantial part of its service independant from Continental. The decision has to be made by September, so any decision on combining this article with Continental should at least be deferred until after ExpressJet announces whether or not they will retain the aircraft and pay increased lease costs toContinental. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.189.218.18 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC-8)
[edit] ExpressJet
I suggest consolidating under ExpressJet. The company is ExpressJet (XJT) and only does business as Continental Express. Other companies that provide feed to Continental are collected under the Continental Connection label. ExpressJet Holdings is the parent of ExpressJet Airlines and owns a few other small businesses. Like the previous comment mentions, XJT will soon be operating 69 airplanes in other business ventures. ExpressJet seems the best label for the company. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jrcampbe (talk • contribs) 12:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC-8)
[edit] Suggest
Keep ExpressJet and COEX separate. At some point two companies will be flying as COEX. ExpressJet is its own entity. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.177.236.116 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC-8)
CO's recent announcement that chautauqua will be operating 44 ERJs as continental express, not continental connection, means the pages should be kept seperate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.25.30.135 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC-8)
