User talk:Evmore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome from Redwolf24

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current time and date is 19:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC).

P.S. I like messages :-P

[edit] Thanks for Messages All!

I clear all messages after I read them, so if they are gone you know I have read them.  :-) Thanks! --Evmore 12:10, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Isolus

The same experience about Doctor Who tells me that the Isolus is a one-shot, because Fear Her pretty much takes the concept as far as it can go. Unlike many science fiction television shows, Doctor Who rarely recycles monsters unless they prove to be really, really popular with the public, like the Daleks or the Cybermen. Fear Her pretty much takes the Isolus concept as far as it will go. There are literally dozens of monsters that have appeared in the series that have never reappeared on screen (including popular ones like the Zygons, or the Zarbi). However, the Zygons and, for another example, the Draconians have their own article because spin-off media deals with them. I understand the impulse to do things right the first time, but then again remember that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - creating a more substantial article when there actually is substance to impart, to my mind, is preferable to creating a perpetual stub. --khaosworks (talkcontribs) 06:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)