Talk:Everett, Washington

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Washington, a comprehensive WikiProject dedicated to articles about topics related to the U.S. state of Washington. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or join by visiting the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.


This article is supported by WikiProject Cities, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Cities on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Contents

[edit] High Schools

Mariner is outside the city limits. Should it be listed as a school in the city?

[edit] New Topic

Anybody else feel like beginning the Everett Massacre article? I might try. Xen0phile 17:55, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gang Violence

I removed the statement, "Sadly Everett is now large of hub for gang violence in the state of Washington" because it is unsupported by statistics relative to the Puget Sound area.

[edit] Crime stats

Good job on keeping NPOV. :-P Citations really are needed, though. Aep 01:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Feel free to get rid of the stats for now. I swear I came across those stats in a city comparison site, but have been unable to find them. Once I do, I will add the appropriate citation.--Hypergeometric2F1(a,b,c,x) 10:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Major Ciy Status

What is the Wiki criteria for "major" city categorization? I would say that containing Boeing's largest manufacturing facility, having a population of ~100,000, and being the seat of the state's fastest-growing county would certainly qualify Everett for such status, at least as much as Vancouver or the TriCities.

206.124.145.1 04:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sports teams table

I think it'd look a lot better, be more intuitive and more compact if the logos and club names were in the header, and the data rows below that. Right now the table layout makes more sense for a computerized database rather than human-readable information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.137.223.153 (talk) 20:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC).