Talk:Evaporator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Evaporator article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Contents 1 School project 2 Messages from Gokhan 3 Cleanup 4 Review from Vivek 5 Review from Jon

[edit] School project

Please do not edit this article until after December 14th. It is written for a student project and is being edited and up-dated after peer review. Thanks. Priya Shoor 00:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Messages from Gokhan

Hi Priya, I found your article which is well organized and written. As you mentioned, you will need to add some references for the information you put here. You should do this by not only giving a list of references at the end but also adding those references to your text. Anyway, you did a great job! GBoran 22:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

The page looks to be coming along nicely. For advice on formatting, please review Wikipedia:Manual of Style. And good luck with the project.  :) --Elonka 06:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Review from Vivek

Hey Priya, the aticle has a lot of good information. It seems well researched. If you could add more images that would be good. Once you add those images of evaporators, it should be fine. Also, some of your equations need to be in the bigger font version that they have on other articles, so it seems more professional. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vivek216 (talk • contribs) 15:25, December 5, 2006 (UTC)

Just as a reminder, please remember to always sign posts with four tildes: ~~~~. This adds your name and a datestamp to your posts, which makes conversations easier to follow. As an advanced technique, you can also personalize your signature, by clicking on "My preferences" at the top of the page and modifying the "Signature" box. --Elonka 03:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Review from Jon

There's a lot of good info here. Good job! I agree with Vivek's suggestion of the addition of diagrams or pictures. Also, the first equation you have is only explained in very loose terms. A little more explanation of what each term is and how this equation is used would be good.

The last couple of paragraphs are pretty long. If you could break them up, it might make them a little easier to follow in this context.

The last thing I have is that there are places when the tone isn't very formal. I did my best to find them and point them out (I've been using Word to insert grammatical corrections and that sort of thing, so I'll email that to you), but it would be good to reread what you have and just see if there are any spots I missed.

Jhsuosu 00:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)