Talk:Eurosia Fabris
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Eurosia Fabris was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake.
Date of review: August 9, 2006 |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, which collaborates on articles related to the Roman Catholic Church. To participate, edit this article or visit the project page for details. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
Eurosia Fabris is part of the WikiProject Saints, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Saints on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to saints as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to saints. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
|
Eurosia Fabris was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake.
Date of review: 13 August 2006 |
Contents |
[edit] GA Nom on hold
You should give inline citations and for the ones where you are using URLs, you should use the {{cite web}} template and record the date you viewed the site. See WP:CITE for details on how to source... plange 04:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GA Status
It's been a week and while I don't agree with the original criticism, (Inline citation format isn't a strict requirement) the many, many, many citation needed tags do clearly make this article not well-referenced. Many of the requests may be frivolous with so many, but there's gotta be more sources for all this stuff. Homestarmy 17:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've added a line under references that cites the major source for the entire article. I also replaced all the html refs with the cite web template. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 11:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GA Failed
It seems that the image on this page is insufficiently tagged. Click the image and see the note in the fair use tag. This article could also be improved in some other ways:
- In-line citations would be a bonus.
- I have marked the last sentence "citation needed". Not only is a citation needed for the controversy, but also for the response that overpopulation may not be a problem after all. Preferably, the latter would cite not a generic article on overpopulation, but rather a published rebuttal to critics of the church's pro-reproduction stance.
- From the lead-in: "Mamma Rosa, was best known to Catholics as a model of holiness in the daily life of a Catholic family." Does the past-tense "was" refer to her lifetime? Was she well-known to Catholics during her life or only posthumously?
- The "early life" section has short, choppy paragraphs that could be made to flow more smoothly.
- The article does not strike me as one that meets the "compelling prose" requirement for a GA article. It gives basic factual information, but is not extraordinarily well-written. Perhaps it could use some tasty tidbits, interesting but brief quotations of primary sources, or quotations by PJPII and other church leaders concerning her importance to Catholics.
- Footnote 3 is repeated. It might be better to make the second reference footnote 4 and write "ibid." as the reference.
CaliforniaKid 07:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Creator of article
Hey, guys. I created this article one day on a whim. I'm not even Catholic, but I'm glad that it was nominated for GA. Although I hope it gets it at some point, I really have no interest in helping it along. Thanks, JHMM13 (T | C) 
23:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
