Talk:European Workers Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mediation, arbitration, and requests for clarification, LaRouche movement, 2004-2007

Requests for clarification 2006 and 2007
"Request for appeal ...", Tsunami Butler, Jan 24, 2007.
"LaRouche again", SlimVirgin, Nov 22,2006.
"Lyndon LaRouche", ManEatingDonut, Oct 23, 2006.

Mediation 2006 and 2007
Informal mediation, November 2006
Informal mediation talk, February 2007

Arbitration 2006
Herschelkrustofsky banned, May 5, 2006.
Herschelkrustofsky enforcement, Apr 15, 2006.
Herschelkrustofsky enforcement request, May 5, 2006.

Arbitration 2005
Nobs01 and others, November 2005.
Cognition's statement in Nobs01 and others, Nov 22, 2005.
Modification of LaRouche 2 in Nobs01 and others, Dec 23, 2005.
Herschelkrustofsky indefinite probation in Nobs01 and others, Dec 23, 2005.
LaRouche 2, Jan 25, 2005–Feb 17, 2005.
LaRouche 2 talk
LaRouche 2 evidence
LaRouche 2 proposed decision
LaRouche 2 proposed decision talk

Arbitration 2004
LaRouche 1, July 4—Sep 13, 2004.
LaRouche 1 talk
LaRouche 1 evidence
LaRouche 1 evidence talk
LaRouche 1 proposed decision
LaRouche 1 proposed decision talk

Mediation 2004
Herschelkrustofsy and AndyL, July 3, 2004.
Herschelkrustofsky and DJSupreme23, June 14, 2004.
Herschelkrustofsky and Adam Carr, November 15, 2004.
Herschelkrustofsky and SlimVirgin, December 16, 2004.

Talk pages 2004-2007
Talk:Lyndon LaRouche
Lyndon LaRouche 1, Jan 17, 2004–Jun 17, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche 2, Jun 20–22, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche 3, Jun 21–24, 2004
Draft, June 24-25, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche 4, Jun 25–July 5, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche 5, Jul 05–Aug 1, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche Jewish issues, June–Aug 2004
Lyndon LaRouche Herschel list, July–Aug 2004
Lyndon LaRouche Herschel list archive
Lyndon LaRouche 6, Aug 6-9, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche 7, Aug 11-17, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche omissions, Sep 9-10, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche 8, Aug 18, 2004–Sep 28, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche 9, Sep 18, 2004–Oct 11, 2004
Lyndon LaRouche 10, Dec 16, 2004–Jan 20, 2005
Lyndon LaRouche partial archive, material missing
Lyndon LaRouche 11, Jan 20, 2005–Jul 19, 2005
Lyndon LaRouche 12, Jul 28, 2005–Nov 12, 2006
Lyndon LaRouche 13, Nov 21, 2006—Feb 18, 2007

Talk:Political views of Lyndon LaRouche
Political views temp
Political views 1, Aug 21, 2004–Nov 29, 2004
Political views 2, Dec 17, 2004–Jan 11, 2005
Political views 3, Jan 11, 2005–Oct 02, 2006
Political views "cooked quotes", Jan 22–23, 2005
Political views, informal mediation, Feb 27, 2006–Mar 04, 2006

Other talk
Talk:United States v. LaRouche
Talk:Schiller Institute
Talk:Schiller Institute/archive1
Talk:Amelia Boynton Robinson
Talk:John Train Salon
Talk:LaRouche Youth Movement
Talk:Helga Zepp-LaRouche
Talk:Jeremiah Duggan
Talk:Jeremiah Duggan/archive1, Nov 14–Dec 6, 2004
Talk:Jeremiah Duggan/archive2, Dec 6, 2004–Jan 12, 2005.
Template Talk:LaRouche

[edit] Furious hate campaigns against Olof Palme

In his edit, anonymous user 172.194.74.72 reacts against the previous wording as being POV according to his edit remark "replace POV language". The original wording was

The EAP launched furious hate campaigns against the Swedish Social Democratic Prime Minister Olof Palme...

end the modified wording is

The EAP was sharply critical of the Swedish Social Democratic Prime Minister Olof Palme...

By this post, I will justify my changing this wording back to the original.

On an on-going basis, the Swedish Government releases various publications. One type of these publications is the so called (sw) Statens offentliga utredningar (SOU), which translates into Swedish Government Official Report. When it comes to the Swedish Wikipedia, the SOU:s are considered to be non-controversial and almost clinically NPOV. In the SOU 2002:91. Magnus Hjort: Hotet från vänster. Säkerhetstjänsternas övervakning av kommunister, anarkister m.m. 1965-2002(The threat from the Left. The Swedish Security Service surveillance of communists, anarchists etc. 1965-2002), the following paragraph is found, referring to the development of the EAP from 1982 and onwards:

It became increasingly common in the media to characterize the EAP as "fascist" or "right-wing extremist". One reason for this was the pronounced anit-sovietism (of the party), its extreme Palme hatred, and its adherence to anti-semitic jargon and conspiration theories.

Further, a few days after the assassination of Olof Palme, Swedish diplomat Sverker Åström was adjoined to the Police investigation acting as Foreign Policy expert. Sverker Åström wrote the following on the EAP, and its possible murder motives, to the Police investigation:

The violently reactionary group, that calls itself EAP and that is governed from the USA by a totally bizarre person, has for years run a violent campaign against Olof Palme. According to available information, the internal discipline among the young followers is tough, and they are trained to fanaticism...

Finally, if the party was just sharply critical of Olof Palme, as at least half the Swedish population was at the time of the assassination, why would the police have been so interested in the party? The answer is that anybody who took notice of the EAP the months, the years and the decade, before the murder of Olof Palme definitely remembers them as more than sharply critical - they did indeed run a furious hate campaign against Olof Palme.

Therefore I change the wording back.

--Astor Piazzolla 13:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

That being the case, the expression should be sourced. "Furious hate campaigns" is not neutral, encyclopediac language. I would suggest you quote the Swedish Government Official Report. --172.190.95.144 05:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Dear Mr. 172.190.95.144. Let me ask you a personal question: Are you the same person that uses the IPs 172.196.220.254 and 172.194.74.72? Whether or not that is the case, is it a coincidence that all three addresses - connected to people only interested in LaRouche articles and typical LaRouche topics - are registered in Virginia, US? You see, the link LaRouche/Virginia can give rise to an interesting hypothesis... Anyhow, I would be much more interested in discussing to you if you were not an anonymous user. I don't know if you lived in Sweden in the 70's and the 80's, I don't know if you are Swedish, and I don't know if you are a LaRouchian or not, so I am not sure that we share the same intellectual references. But this is the case: I don't have the time now, but I will wikify this article and I will give you all quotes needed to validate the usage Furious hate campaigns as a neutral term. The EAP wrote for instance the following in New Solidarity in 1975:
The Swedish people is governed by a maniac, a mentally disordered murderer, who turns up in the dark, bitter winter night and who snuggles up to his victim with an ax in his hand. This smelling eructation from a dead world, offspring of a mentally ill military aristocracy...
The article was illustrated with a painting depicting Olof Palme as the the Reaper with the cowl and the axe, naming him The Devil of the Devil. [1] Therefore, it is not POV to name the activities of the party as Furious hate campaigns. My intention is to wikify the article and to merge my writings on the talk page to it. --Astor Piazzolla 09:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

I have a user name now, so there should be no confusion. Your theories about my location and motives are wrong. I am not suggesting that you be nice to LaRouche. I am just suggesting that in an encyclopedia, if you need to use very strong language, it is better to quote a source than to publish your own value judgment, no matter how correct it may be. Also, I don't think that it is proper to link from the article to the talk page. If the information is important, it should just be in the article. The talk page is for discussion. --ManEatingDonut 06:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

You are correct, and I am sorry if I offended you by my assumptions on location and motives. As I mention above, I intend to wikify the article in due course. My conjecture - that the adjective furious is appropriate and not POV - I still consider to be valid. I will quote the sources in the article eventually. By the way, just being curious, why are you interested in the EAP? --Astor Piazzolla 07:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not especially interested in the EAP. I am interested in LaRouche, because I think it is difficult to distinguish fact from fiction when various publications report on him. A lot of it is self-contradictory. I was reading through the articles on the "LaRouche template" and I noticed that the language on this one was a bit outside what I would consider appropriate for an encyclopedia article. --ManEatingDonut 22:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Incorrect translation of name

In the LaRouche publications, they always translated EAP as "European Labor Party." They also had a "U.S. Labor Party" in the 70s, as well as a "North American Labor Party" in Canada and a "Mexican Labor Party." In addition, there were EAPs in Denmark, Germany, Italy and France. --172.191.201.152 21:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

It is correct that there were several EAP:s in other countries than Sweden. However, the Swedish EAP is the only one of these that still exists. The term European Workers Party is an exact translation of Swedish Europeiska Arbetarpartiet, where the "s" in Workers signifies plural and not genitive. Hence, European Workers Party is a translation, while European Labor Party is the American denomination of the party. Further, in Sweden, the existing title of the article is the common denomination of the (Swedish) party. For instance, during the Olof Palme assassination investigation, this term was the one commonly used by medias covering it - both by English speaking journalists and others. --Astor Piazzolla 07:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)