Talk:Eurocopter EC 145

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aviation, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles related to aviation. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Aviation Portal

Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.See comments

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related WikiProjects and/or task forces:
	Rotorcraft task force

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

[edit] Military History Project?

Just wondering how the EC145 figures into Military History? (Born2flie 13:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC))

See below: The EC-145 is the basis for the US Army UH-72A Lakota, which was a Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) acquisition program. Jjvcfi 22:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, built solely for missions which any other commercial aircraft can be used for. I don't recall the Bell 206 being tagged by WP:MILHIST. Perhaps it is because the military variant of the Bell 206, the OH-58 has its own article, much like the UH-72 has. --Born2flie 02:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was there was no consensus. --Born2flie 03:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge Recommendation

Support. Like the Hughes 300 redirects to its most current version, the Schweizer 300C, the MBB/Kawasaki BK117 should redirect to the company and model description that currently owns the production rights to the aircraft. Both articles are also stubs and will benefit from the merge.

--Born2flie 00:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support: Due especially to the minimal content of the BK117 page, as there won't be any new production of that model forthcoming. - BillCJ 01:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  - Since the UH-72A Lakota is a EC 145, the merging action should perhaps include this article too or at least include the links Jaypee1 09:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
    
    This has been discussed and rejected several times on the UH-72A Lakota talk page. Links should already be included. - BillCJ 00:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Oppose - There is enough info in the other article to keep on its own. And why should the non-continuation of a product have anything to do with whether an article will be extended? MadMaxDog 08:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Oppose merge of MBB/Kawasaki BK117 with EC 145 and oppose merge of EC 145 and UH 72 Chwyatt 19:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/u/r/Talk%7EEurocopter_EC_145_e7e8.html"

Categories: Stub-Class rotorcraft articles | Stub-Class aviation articles | Stub-Class military history articles