User talk:Ersby

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Ersby. Added requested quote at for 2% above chance on Remote viewing discussion page. Paper had been cited and was listed in references with link. User:Kazuba 30 Sept 20

Hello Ersby. I beg to differ with you. The paper I cited is a later study than the one you mention. At first they got about 5-15% about the same as the Ganzfeld eperiments. It looks like they did a later study. This paper is also cited by the Parapsychological Association at Member line articles. Chance has always been 25% even in the Ganzfeld experiments. You are picking one out of four. The hit rate has never been large numbers. It has always been close to chance. I do not think 2% OVER CHANCE is easily confused with 2%. If it is, perhaps it can be spelled out to make it clearer, rather than deleting the figures all together. There should be figures here. User:Kazuba 7 Oct 2006