User talk:Ernst Stavro Blofeld/ArchiveSept2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] King Dracula Replies to You

Thank you for your excellent advise

King Dracula 10:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summaries

I noticed that you don't seem to use edit summaries at all. That's your choice but are you aware by not indicating what you are doing you create extra work for people who have articles you edit on their watchlists? Thanks --Spartaz 10:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of villages and municipalities in Slovakia

Good work. I am afraid I will not have enough time to help you with the stub creation. I have created some of the articles about towns and villages in Slovakia and I will be happy to expand and create some new ones. But I doubt I will be able to help you very much. So, just few advices: All municipalities in Slovakia are legally divided into two categories: towns and villages. I wonder if it is a good idea to have two overlapping lists (see List of towns in Slovakia). Statistical data can be found here and it is a very helpful (though not very well-designed) website. I think there is no need to include the maps of the given region and district in an article about a municipality. But you can find some maps with the precise location of a municipality in the commons, in the Category:Locator maps of cities in Slovakia. Good luck and if you have any more specific question, feel free to drop me a line. Tankred 19:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

You can use ‎Template:Infobox Slovak town as an infobox. We usually use it in articles about municipalities in Slovakia. Coordinates may be found here and some of the location maps here. Coats of arms (few of them) are here. Have fun. Tankred 15:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] King Dracula Replies to You Again

Thank you for your wonderful advise, my friend

King Dracula 11:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vale of Glamorgan stub category

Hi, I created it before but it was voted for deletion as there weren't enough articles to make it worthwhile and the stub was not appropriately named. If you think that Vale of Glamorgan will have more than 50 geographical stubs (which is the rule of thumb) then it may be worth creating again, submit your proposal to Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals otherwise just use the Wales-geo-stub. (Sloman 11:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC))

I've put forward a proposal for creating the stub on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2006/September. Can you also add a few notes to help make the case for creating the stub, i.e. saying that you intend to create many more and that it will be well over 50 articles. (Sloman 11:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Ingrid Lehmann and Hermann Schulz

Ingrids article is expanded and Hermanns established. Please check the English. To transfer this scientific stuff into English is difficult. I am very curious, why you are so interested in them...? There i also an article about Ingrids husband in the german Wikipedia. Uwe Langer 20:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wales

Hello. Thanks for welcoming me back. :) I have spent my vacation in Beskids. It was wonderful. I wanted to ask you if people in Wales speak with each other in English or in Cymraeg ? Is Welsh language taught at schools ? Btw yesterday's match was close. I think Wales can win in home match with Czech Rep. - Darwinek 11:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dracula this time talks to you nicely

Thank you for your wonderful advise my good friend.

[edit] Villages in the Czech Republic

There are officially 6248 cities, towns and villages in the Czech Republic, about 95% of them are villages. The sub-categorizing may be useful but AFAIK neither Czech nor German Wikipedias (which have better coverage than here) do not use it.

I use district categories because it is the most natural (for the Czechs) and these categories also cover castles, lakes and such. The same categorisation was (later) adopted in Czech Wiki. Regions, as they exist now, are quite novel in the CR and most people are still thinking in older geographical structures.

I am not sure how this is solved for countries with similar or larger # of villages or whether there are some semi-standards or recomendations. The current huge category is automatically splitted and there's navigation bar to quickly find what one needs. Pavel Vozenilek 14:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

My opinion is following: technically it doesn'n make problem and I am very lazy for changes. However if the others think otherwise I'll accomodate. Perhaps you can get opinion from User:Bilboq (the most active one in creating geo-stubs on Czech Wiki) or other people or those who structure such categories. Pavel Vozenilek 14:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I'd asked Bilboq for opinion. Other user active in this area is User:Ioannes Pragensis who created list All Czech municipalities A - I, .... Pavel Vozenilek 15:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Districts have advantage that they have usually managable size - each have from about 30 (few smallest ones) to 200 (few largest ones) municipalities. Usually around 100. Many of them consits of smaller villages. If you count every village in each of the 6248 municipalities, you get about 20500 villages (some of them are in fact towns or town/city districts). Add some castles, some notable landmarks, etc ... and you can end up with 30000 articles about some geographic locations in czech republic. If you split them into 78 districts, you have on average 380 per districts ... which mean two pages in category listing. If you use regions, you'll end up with average of 2140 pages in each of 14 regions, which is badly managable (there is that stupid limitation of showing at most 200 items on each page). --Bilboq 20:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

To make it clear about the terminology: municipality (obec - village, town) is an official administrative structure and which may and often does consist from parts (část obce - villages, hamlets, districts). So far en: has only articles about the municipalities - to cover all the villages on en: is practically impossible within next years. Czech Wiki tries to create complete coverage. Pavel Vozenilek 22:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Once they are all in czech wiki (now about 800 from 6200 municipalities is missing), copying them into en might not be so hard, as you have good source tot star with .... --Bilboq 12:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
If the others decide I'll accomodate anything. If possible there should be 1 : 1 relation between categories on English and Czech Wiki since it helps to spot what is missing and what is wrong (I have no contact on German Wiki). Pavel Vozenilek 16:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zborov

I am not doing the villages, I try to fill in all the meanings of Zborov that is treated very differently in different Wikis. Pavel Vozenilek 21:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] American

I noticed that you recently added a link to American here. American is a disambiguation page as the phrase has many uses including a person from the Americas or the United States. In the future, could you link the term to one of the articles listed on the American disambiguation term, that would be great. As an example, if you're linking to something related to the United States, you would input [[United States|American]]. Thanks! --Bobblehead 08:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Previews

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 15:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your short and tall articles

Your short and tall lists violate WP:NOT. Thank you. Moland Spring 21:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Olympic athletics

Per your request, I have completed Athletics at the 1936 Summer Olympics and Athletics at the 1948 Summer Olympics. Note that I had to remove the images that you had added to these and other Athletics at the Olympics pages. The rings image violates fair-use policy, so is being removed from many Olympic pages lately, and the other image often interferes with the proper rendering of the tables of medal winners (overlays them sometimes). Andrwsc 22:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I will complete Athletics at the 1956 Summer Olympics this weekend. I have an Excel spreadsheet that makes it relatively easy to cut & paste from the IOC results database and produce Wiki markup in the standard table format we're using. The only work I have to do after that is check all the wikilinked names, so in all, it takes maybe an hour or two to do a sport like Athletics with about 100 names to check. Andrwsc 16:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nancy Drew

Sure but Im concentrating on doing book infobox. Just give me time. OK? Hedwig0407 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

My reply: Thanks but, honestly, I have hard time doing the main article. I have difficulty doing such works but if I push myself to do it, I can make it. Besides, I havent read the Nancy Drew books, only the PC games. Hedwig0407 (talk • contribs) Hedwig0407 14:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok sorry I have seen some of your others and realise now you are quite capable. Its such I figured even in the inital entry you would just category and inital sentence it. --- What do you mean? By the way, I've already finished the 48 original books of Nancy Drew, the infobox thing. I know it's pretty simple but, it still need of more information like the first publication date, book cover illustrator. Hedwig0407 (talk • contribs) Hedwig0407 15:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Newar/ Vajrayana

  • Newars practice Vajrayana. The Vajrayana that they follow is a a bit different as they have a Vajrachharya rather than a Lama. Vajrayana is an integral part of their culture. So, Vajrayana is kept in Category Newar.--Eukesh 19:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] link to defender

Hello, when you want to link to the article about a defender, please do not link to defender, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as defender (football) by writing out [[defender (football)|defender]] Regards, -- Jeff3000 22:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)


thanks thanks for helping me in editing.may be pleased to continue ur help.Nileena joseph 02:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arkhangelsk Oblast

Hello, Ernst! I've noticed your message to Goudzovski, and just want to drop you a note advising against the template you are suggesting. Arkhangelsk Oblast is one of the three Russian federal subjects that does not yet have an article about its administrative divisions, but it will eventually (for the list of existing articles, see this template). Once the article is in place, a template like the one you are suggesting will for the most part be redundant. Also, it will be terribly overloaded with information—there are, for example, close to 4,000 rural settlements in Arkhangelsk Oblast alone. The terminology currently used in the template is also inconsistent and incorrect.

Please let me know if you have questions/comments. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

That is true, eventually they will need to be done. The city/town navboxes are currently in development, and the raion ones are low priority because there aren't that many articles about raions yet. A navbox is only useful when there are articles it can navigate :)
As for the Ukrainian navboxes, I'm not a huge fan of those. They are too bloated, in my view. Considering how most of the articles on Russian federal subjects are barely stubs, adding a bloated navbox would just overwhelm them without adding much value.
In any case, do what you feel is right, only please make sure that it fits into already existing naming and navigational schemes (I had to rename all articles you created about the districts, for example, which could have been easily avoided if you checked how other oblasts are structured). Also, make sure you use right terminology ("subdivisions" and "administrative divisions" are not the same thing, for example)—I don't mind to clean up, but I'd rather have it done right in the first place.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions—I'll be glad to help! Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Administrative divisions of Russia

Crossposted from User talk:Ezhiki:

OK but all of the Russian oblasts need a raion and city navigation box as is covered in Ukraine. Otherwise vast important info is not present. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 08:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

That is true, eventually they will need to be done. The city/town navboxes are currently in development, and the raion ones are low priority because there aren't that many articles about raions yet. A navbox is only useful when there are articles it can navigate :)
As for the Ukrainian navboxes, I'm not a huge fan of those. They are too bloated, in my view. Considering how most of the articles on Russian federal subjects are barely stubs, adding a bloated navbox would just overwhelm them without adding much value.
In any case, do what you feel is right, only please make sure that it fits into already existing naming and navigational schemes (I had to rename all articles you created about the districts, for example, which could have been easily avoided if you checked how other oblasts are structured). Also, make sure you use right terminology ("subdivisions" and "administrative divisions" are not the same thing, for example)—I don't mind to clean up, but I'd rather have it done right in the first place.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions—I'll be glad to help! Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Yes I absolutely agree with you there is no point just yet setting up the navigation bozes if no or very minor articles. But Russian federal subjects are vastly underdeveloped compared to others on wikipedia and should not be excuded from being developed evenly and properly. At present I think it is best a Wikiproject:Russia or Russian Oblasts get together and go through each of the raion districts.Agreed? I won't waste any time on boxes yet. At present though the underdeveloped and missing articles are quite embarrassing to the project!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I believe what you are looking for is Wikipedia:WikiProject Russian federal subjects, which I started in 2004, and which has been in limbo for over a year now. It has all the guidelines regarding how the articles on Russian federal subjects should be formatted and what information is the most essential. If you wish to join (or take over :)) that project, you are very welcome to do so. Heck, if you stick with it (others who came before you did not last long, unfortunately), I might as well resume working on it. Starting working on districts, I think, can wait until we have decent articles on higher-level administrative units, stubbiness of which is a true embarassment to the project. They are also a place to start if you wish to see the Russia-related geo-content "developed evenly and properly".—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Oh and by the way I did check article names but with Ukraine called .... Raion. Another inconsistency on wikipedia. Russian districts are not called ...Raion but Ukrainian ones are?
Ukraine is a different country. A community of Ukrainian editors works on Ukraine-related articles. Accordingly, a community of Russian editors works on Russia-related articles. If Ukrainians want to primarily call their districts "raions" in English, it is their decision. For Russia, the consensus was that the term "districts" works better. A similar situation is with oblasts. Russian and Ukrainian ones are "oblasts", but Belarusian are "voblasts", and those in Kazakhstan are "provinces". And so on, and so forth. What works for one country does not necessarily work for another. Still, theoretically, would "raions" work for Russia? Absolutely. The thing, however, is that the infrastructural schemes for Russian administrative divisions were set up before the Ukrainian and Belarusian ones. When Ukrainian and Belarusian folks decided it was time to create their own infrastructures, they did not use the same scheme as Russia, but created their own. That, if you wondered, is the reason why similar administrative units, dating back to the same Soviet concept, are called differently in Wikipedia. For the record, it took me a week to convince Ukrainian editors to use the term urban-type settlement to refer to pgts; I simply don't have either time or desire to go through convincing them that "districts" is a better term than "raions", especially considering that Ukrainian editors are probably just as unwilling to dismantle a working solution in favor of an alternative with dubious benefits as I am. It would be an arduous work resulting in very slim improvements.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
yes the information in the admin seperate articles is excellent but iI think it needs putting in a less confusing table or something Ernst Stavro Blofeld 19:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the compliment, and same wavelength it is :) As a matter of fact, I've been thinking about how to make the administrative divisions articles into featured lists. Currently, administrative divisions of Adygea is the most developed, and the only one that underwent a peer review (a link to which is available through that article's talk page). It is also a good demonstration of why I cut the administrative divisions into separate articles instead of leaving them as a section in the main article in the first place—the end result is intended to be a lot more than just a bland list of administrative divisions. I do agree, however, that their layout can be improved. If you have any suggestions, I will be only too happy to listen—so far there's been plenty of critics, but no one seems to be willing to actually suggest improvements that would work (administrative divisions of Moscow is a great example of an alternative layout that works just as poorly as the existing one). As for the tables being confusing, it is, unfortunately, for the most part due to the fact that the ties and structures they describe are just as confusing. A table is the most natural choice that allows the work to be done, but is not necessarily the best fit for the final output. When you have a city divided into districts with a few towns and urban-type settlements under jurisdiction of each district and with each town having several selsovets in their subordinance, no matter how you stack them, you are bound to get output that's confusing to (at least some) readers.
Anyway, back to the main articles. I have nothing against putting sleak boxes with all administrative divisions listed, but, again, while administrative divisions are an important aspect, they are not the most important one. The very least that needs to be done to the articles on federal subjects is infoboxes (most republics already have one) with basic stats. Until it's done, any one elaborately written and nicely formatted section would just highlight overall inadequacy of the whole article and look out-of-place. By the way, it only takes an hour at most to make a summary box with administrative divisions for any given federal subject, so believe me, "hard to make" was not the reason why we still don't have them. I by no means want to discourage you from taking onto this endeavor, I just want you to understand that your work will likely not be as appreciated as you probably hope, and that the overall level of interest towards Russian administrative divisions from others is quite, erm, absent low. If that's not a problem for you, go ahead, make the boxes :) I'll gladly lend a hand in reviewing them and making sure they fit into existing scheme. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Astrakhan Oblast

By the way, I very much hope you are not going to leave things this way. Note that the full districts names must be used, because there is a good chance that just the name without qualifiers will land you elsewhere (which, in this edit, is exemplified by Krasnoyarsky—a separate dab page). If you are just trying out ideas, may I suggest that you do it in your userspace. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Handball venues

I couldn't find a team handball venue category under Category:Sports venues by sport. Patken4 13:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jonathan Cornelius

I've seen this same issue come up with other people who don't want articles about themselves, and the argument usually does not prevail. In any case, take it to AFD if you must, but "subject request" is not a speedy delete category. NawlinWiki 21:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

The article does have a problem that needs correcting, however. The title lists his name as "Jonathen Cornelius," but the content says "Jonathan Cornelius." Google searches bring up only four listings for "Jonathen", all within Wikipedia, but plenty with "Jonathan." When I did a Wikipedia search for "Jonathan," it redirects to "Jonathen." Clearly, the title needs to be fixed, but I'm still new enough that I'm not sure how to do it. Care to attack this one?
Septegram 14:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi back. Thanks for the speedy response.
If the correct spelling is Jonathen, then perhaps we should have a brief comment to the effect that this is a common form of the name in Wales? If you're going to work on the article a bit, I'll leave it to you.
Wonder why he doesn't want the article here. Maybe he doesn't like the fact that it's using up twenty seconds of his fifteen minutes of fame? ;)
Septegram 14:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC) (who should go and do some of the work for which he's being paid now)

[edit] aw, you beat me to it!

I had a neat photo for the Royal Palace in Naples. I had just written the thing and it took 18 seconds to upload my picture. Lo and behold, yours was there. You must have been lurking. Boo-hiss. I forgive you. Looks ok.Jeffmatt 11:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] hey, there you are again!

We must be tethered. You pop in about 12 seconds after I screw up. Thank you correcting the capitalization on Carmine Castle. Sorry for the bother. Jeffmatt 09:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Olympics

Tip: Use http://www.databaseolympics.com/index.htm for birthdates, and also http://www.olympic-medallists.com/CHAMPINDEX.HTM for birth- and death dates for older Olympians. Cheers, Punkmorten 12:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Villages in Slovakia

Hi. Your starter articles about villages in Slovakia are really great - well structured and providing relevant information (despite their stub character). Thank you very much. Tankred 15:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Czech districts

I started created few of them, e.g. Pardubice District, more-less by merging Czech and German Wiki content. It is that I am lazy to finish the 81 articles. I'll try to battle with self but I cannot promise anything. Pavel Vozenilek 20:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lok Sabha bios

Thanks, I will try to take care of that from now onwards. Shyam (T/C) 15:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] link to British

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to British, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as United Kingdom or Great Britain by writing out [[United Kingdom|British]] or [[Great Britain|British]]. Regards, Jeff3000 14:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Japanese

Hi Blofeld, thanks for the compliment. I am English-speaking. I find these translations are a great way to improve my Japanese (which could be a lot better) and learn about Japanese art. Nice to meet you, have a good day. Zargulon 10:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi I would like to see your Japan-related articles, where are they and what does "underground layer" mean, please forgive my ignorance. Zargulon 10:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: scot footy

Which Scottish categories are you referring to? How do they not register? - Dudesleeper 16:15, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I forgot to add any categories when I initially posted the article. That's probably when you viewed the page. - Dudesleeper 16:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I don't see how a space stops the category from working, but whatever. That's the way I've always done it. I looked back to the page when I first added the categories and they were fine. Or are you saying the don't show up in lists of categories if it has a space in it? - Dudesleeper 16:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
No worries - you were trying to help after all. - Dudesleeper 16:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bismarck...

Howdy... thanks for your message. Generally speaking, a FAC nomination very rarely succeeds w/o the nominator actively addressing objections - i.e. if there are objections, you should fix it. So... it seems the best person to fix the article is YOU. :)... (I am busy with other projects). Regards, Mikker (...) 00:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] That article you created?

I see no sexual innuendo, you made it seem like nonsense. LOL, it's a perfect stub! :P

~ Flameviper 16:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leon Moreaux

HI does my article Léon Moreaux look ok to you? I have his date of birth but can't find death. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 20:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

It's quite good, and perhaps DYK-worthy? I coudln't find his death date either, because the historical Olympians page doesn't list medalists in the unofficial 1906 Olympics.
If you want to submit it to DYK it should be a bit longer. And do you know how? You could mention his non-podium placements in the Olympics as well. He finished fourth twice, fifth, sixth etc. See this page. Make it DYK-worthy, you can do it! Punkmorten 20:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations with the DYK. And I see you found a good source for the Slovakian geography, that's sweet!! Punkmorten 18:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] orthography

Would you like to consider to use proper orthography in your Sāmoan articles, writing Mālietoa, for example? I know, Sāmoans themselves are too lazy to care, but an encyclopedia has to set the example, has not it? --Tauʻolunga 02:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] DYK

Updated DYK query On 30 September 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Léon Moreaux, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

[edit] Baseball player stubs

I know there is one for Puerto Rico. I would doubt one exists for the U.S. simply because there would be way too many pages. I'll add the appropriate one to Jose Guzman's page. Thanks for the catch. Patken4 13:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I see you already did it. Thanks! Patken4 13:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/r/n/User_talk%7EErnst_Stavro_Blofeld_ArchiveSept2006_fa21.html"