Talk:Epistles of Clement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shouldn't this be referred to as the "Epistles of Clement" vice "1 Clement"? With no information on 2 Clement at present, it is probably best to wrap the pair up together for the moment. Mitsukai 19:54, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I totally agree. Compare the Pastoral epistles I recently collected together. Context counts! --Wetman 19:59, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I've moved the page, and reaimed all the links to 1 Clement and 2 Clement here. Hope no one minds my being bold. Jwrosenzweig 16:40, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
No, these ought to be split. There shouldn't be one article on two different works, unless that article compares the two and two seperate articles exist for the subset works. Thanatosimii 21:41, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that two separate articles seems appropriate. I'll try to expanding the text substantially and create two the two articles. --Alecmconroy 22:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Your stubs are prepared. We don't usually cannibalize existing articles to make new ones. --Wetman 23:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)