Talk:Epic of Manas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Epic of Manas is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang, Tibet and Central Asian portions of Iran and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.

Is Manas Fake?

Question: I always thought that the stories of Manas were fake, that they weren't "traditional" pieces pursée. What I thought was that the stories of Manas were fabricated by Soviet scholars in the 1930s because the Kyrgyz people lacked an official "history". As a result, becuase of this gerrymandering that was typical of Joseph Dzjugavishili-Stalin's tactics, the stories of Manas were forced down the Kyrgyz people's throats and were forced to accept it as gospel {as well as the "Cyrillicization" of their Turkic language which I'm assuming used the Arabic script), thus resulting in the cult of Manas. Is this true, or am I simply going mad?

If you want to know what I'm talking about, one of the back issues of Passport to World Band Radio (I don't know which one) had a series of articles by Indian correspondent Mansoji Guha on radio in Central Asia, one of which mentions Kyrgyzstan and the fabrication of the Manas stories was listed as a sidebar.

Posted by: Daniel Blanchette, Monday, 26 September, 2005, 22:25 EDT

It's false, because "Manas" were first published in 1885 in Russia by professor V.V.Radloff.Greenvert 11:41, 2 December 2005 (UTC)