User talk:Eowbotm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
perhaps this will work:
wtf? I mean, c'mon man. I swear it won't happen again. I just figured i'd see how much it took to get myself blocked. While this was perhaps an annoyance, I honestly don't think it merits a permanent block. Seriously, I will be constructive.
And, just btw Redvers, your attempt to be cool how you declined my blocking attempt failed miserably. "Thank you and goodbye"? I mean, c'mon man. At least some valid reason should be given. I didn't just say "unblock me n00b" or something like that. Jesus. I apologized sincerely, and this is your response? not cool.
well, I'll give y'all two days to either unblock me or give me a reason as to why not. And if you do have a good reason, I will listen. otherwise I'll just make a another account under some obscure name and annoy you guys some more. Making multiple accounts is fairly simple.I'm sure I can have plenty of fun vandalizing. While I dislike setting ultimatums, Redvers response was uncalled for. Eowbotm 19:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm glad you have such lofty goals in life - to vandalize other people's good work, and annoy Wiki administrators. I can imagine you'll look back with content when you're on your deathbed. -Patstuart 21:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- What the hell? Lofty goals in life? Did you read what I said? I was just having some fun...at others expense, yes, but just some quick fun. This is ridiculous. As I have said time and time again here, it won't happen again. If I really wanted to I could just make another profile and work from there...I've already given you my word that it won't happen again...if it does then I will have no problem with a permablock. but it won't...why do you people keep coming back with stupid flase statements about stuff that you don't know shit about. I mean, the fact that you're admins on Wikipedia doesn't make you some sort of God. Your statement is ridiculous, unhelpful, and an ad hominem attack, which is, following the standards of wikipedia, not allowed. Is it really so hard to offer a second chance?
- I'm not an admin here, so if you're frustrated at my tone, I apologize, but I don't represent the administration. If you want to create another user, you can probably find a way to do it; but I would suggest, no, ask of you, that you would refrain from vandalism. You will probably not convince the admins to reinstate this account, however, because you had several warnings, including a last warning which specifically said don't do this again, and you continued. Good luck, though, I hope you become a good Wikipedian.-Patstuart 02:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Now there's the kind of response I was looking for...thank you for your rationality.Eowbotm 21:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin here, so if you're frustrated at my tone, I apologize, but I don't represent the administration. If you want to create another user, you can probably find a way to do it; but I would suggest, no, ask of you, that you would refrain from vandalism. You will probably not convince the admins to reinstate this account, however, because you had several warnings, including a last warning which specifically said don't do this again, and you continued. Good luck, though, I hope you become a good Wikipedian.-Patstuart 02:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
...Eowbotm1 13:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sockpuppetry
The use of sockpuppets to evade a block is prohibited. If you want to be unblocked, creating blatant sockpuppet accounts and then using them to continue vandalising is a spectacularly ineffective way of going about it. Guy (Help!) 13:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Is it now? I seem to have attempted to come back as a legit editor through this, and have been denied many times, rather unreasonably, giving me much reason to be angry...and I still have several other accounts you ahve not found, besides 2,3 and 4...good luck!Eowbotm 13:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
